| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
To test Git's behavior with very large pack files, we need a way to
generate such files quickly.
A naive approach using only readily-available Git commands would take
over 10 hours for a 4GB pack file, which is prohibitive.
Side-stepping Git's machinery and actual zlib compression by writing
uncompressed content with the appropriate zlib header makes things
much faster. The fastest method using this approach generates many
small, unreachable blob objects and takes about 1.5 minutes for 4GB.
However, this cannot be used because we need to test git clone, which
requires a reachable commit history.
Generating many reachable commits with small, uncompressed blobs takes
about 4 minutes for 4GB. But this approach 1) does not reproduce the
issues we want to fix (which require individual objects larger than
4GB) and 2) is comparatively slow because of the many SHA-1
calculations.
The approach taken here generates a single large blob (filled with NUL
bytes), along with the trees and commits needed to make it reachable.
This takes about 2.5 minutes for 4.5GB, which is the fastest option
that produces a valid, clonable repository with an object large enough
to trigger the bugs we want to test.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Throughout the Git codebase we're using the typedeffed version of
`z_stream`, which maps to `struct z_stream_s`. By using a typedef
instead of the struct it becomes somewhat harder to predeclare the
symbol so that headers depending on the struct can do so without having
to pull in "zlib-compat.h".
We don't yet have users that would really care about this: the only
users that declare `z_stream` as a pointer are in "reftable/block.h",
which is a header that is internal to the reftable library. But in the
next step we're going to expose the `struct reftable_block` publicly,
and that struct does contain a pointer to `z_stream`. And as the public
header shouldn't depend on "reftable/system.h", which is an internal
implementation detail, we won't have the typedef for `z_stream` readily
available.
Prepare for this change by using `struct z_stream_s` throughout our code
base. In case zlib-ng is used we use a define to map from `z_stream_s`
to `zng_stream_s`.
Drop the pre-declaration of `struct z_stream` while at it. This struct
does not exist in the first place, and the declaration wasn't needed
because "reftable/block.h" already includes "reftable/basics.h" which
transitively includes "reftable/system.h" and thus "git-zlib.h".
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The zlib-ng library is a hard fork of the old and venerable zlib
library. It describes itself as zlib replacement with optimizations for
"next generation" systems. As such, it contains several implementations
of central algorithms using for example SSE2, AVX2 and other vectorized
CPU intrinsics that supposedly speed up in- and deflating data.
And indeed, compiling Git against zlib-ng leads to a significant speedup
when reading objects. The following benchmark uses git-cat-file(1) with
`--batch --batch-all-objects` in the Git repository:
Benchmark 1: zlib
Time (mean ± σ): 52.085 s ± 0.141 s [User: 51.500 s, System: 0.456 s]
Range (min … max): 52.004 s … 52.335 s 5 runs
Benchmark 2: zlib-ng
Time (mean ± σ): 40.324 s ± 0.134 s [User: 39.731 s, System: 0.490 s]
Range (min … max): 40.135 s … 40.484 s 5 runs
Summary
zlib-ng ran
1.29 ± 0.01 times faster than zlib
So we're looking at a ~25% speedup compared to zlib. This is of course
an extreme example, as it makes us read through all objects in the
repository. But regardless, it should be possible to see some sort of
speedup in most commands that end up accessing the object database.
The zlib-ng library provides a compatibility layer that makes it a
proper drop-in replacement for zlib: nothing needs to change in the
build system to support it. Unfortunately though, this mode isn't easy
to use on most systems because distributions do not allow you to install
zlib-ng in that way, as that would mean that the zlib library would be
globally replaced. Instead, many distributions provide a package that
installs zlib-ng without the compatibility layer. This version does
provide effectively the same APIs like zlib does, but all of the symbols
are prefixed with `zng_` to avoid symbol collisions.
Implement a new build option that allows us to link against zlib-ng
directly. If set, we redefine zlib symbols so that we use the `zng_`
prefixed versions thereof provided by that library. Like this, it
becomes possible to install both zlib and zlib-ng (without the compat
layer) and then pick whichever library one wants to link against for
Git.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The function `deflateSetHeader()` has been introduced with zlib v1.2.2.1,
so we don't use it when linking against an older version of it. Refactor
the code to instead provide a central stub via "compat/zlib.h" so that
we can adapt it based on whether or not we use zlib-ng in a subsequent
commit.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The `deflateBound()` function has only been introduced with zlib 1.2.0.
When linking against a zlib version older than that we thus provide our
own compatibility shim. Move this shim into "compat/zlib.h" so that we
can adapt it based on whether or not we use zlib-ng in a subsequent
commit.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Introduce a new "compat/zlib-compat.h" header that we include instead of
including <zlib.h> directly. This will allow us to wire up zlib-ng as an
alternative backend for zlib compression in a subsequent commit.
Note that we cannot just call the file "compat/zlib.h", as that may
otherwise cause us to include that file instead of <zlib.h>.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
