summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/kconfig/expr.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJulian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>2026-08-01 15:52:38 +0100
committerNicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>2026-08-14 21:33:20 +0200
commit35e4b60792cd45d57c3af00f67bb5bf9ae4243e9 (patch)
tree6f8733d7a33fe3552be466c2d8e70456cb6b22ed /scripts/kconfig/expr.c
parent14b8b4bf2d7bd5d58c17adbeed0edfda1dfc1a7f (diff)
kconfig: fix submenu rendering of negative dependencies
The Kconfig frontend should render options that depend on a previous option in the submenu of that previous option. But currently, this breaks for negative dependencies. For example, option FOO may be rendered in the submenu of option BAR, despite FOO actually depending on !BAR. Let's fix this ironic rendering by modifying Kconfig to explicitly check negative dependencies. I've only tested locally on x86, but as far as I can tell, this only changes how 2 options are rendered in the menu: 1. NTFS3_FS, no longer in the NTFS_FS submenu, and 2. MTD_BLOCK_RO, no longer in the MTD_BLOCK submenu. Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Reported-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cbe95c15d2760f6fce8eaf207c969ce8fd3703aa.camel@xry111.site/ Assisted-by: Claude:claude-4.8-opus Signed-off-by: Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260801145238.2140291-1-julianbraha@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org> Tested-by: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/kconfig/expr.c')
-rw-r--r--scripts/kconfig/expr.c33
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c
index 16f92c4a775a..2b91d16bf14f 100644
--- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c
+++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c
@@ -738,6 +738,39 @@ bool expr_contains_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym)
return false;
}
+/*
+ * Check if the expression references 'sym' in a way that is satisfiable
+ * with 'sym' disabled, e.g.'sym!=y'.
+ *
+ * Expects that expr_transform() was already called on 'expr'.
+ */
+bool expr_contains_symbol_negated(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym)
+{
+ if (!dep)
+ return false;
+
+ switch (dep->type) {
+ case E_AND:
+ case E_OR:
+ return expr_contains_symbol_negated(dep->left.expr, sym) ||
+ expr_contains_symbol_negated(dep->right.expr, sym);
+ case E_NOT:
+ return dep->left.expr->type == E_SYMBOL &&
+ dep->left.expr->left.sym == sym;
+ case E_EQUAL:
+ /* sym=n */
+ return dep->left.sym == sym && dep->right.sym == &symbol_no;
+ case E_UNEQUAL:
+ /* sym!=y, sym!=m */
+ return dep->left.sym == sym &&
+ (dep->right.sym == &symbol_yes ||
+ dep->right.sym == &symbol_mod);
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
bool expr_depends_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym)
{
if (!dep)