diff options
| author | Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> | 2026-09-07 23:26:32 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> | 2026-09-09 09:47:57 +0200 |
| commit | e780259b54e618ceb4763fbc21314acf3565e813 (patch) | |
| tree | f91f36a3a451072d0d8ab740cffef84b048166a7 | |
| parent | cdd812d0683dee14ead02c9eded568685e61b23f (diff) | |
exec: do_close_on_exec() before taking exec_update_lock
do_close_on_exec() currently happens while holding the exec_update_lock,
which is used in a lot of places that access process state to
synchronize access checks.
I recently added another such use of exec_update_lock, causing a
regression.
do_close_on_exec() can block waiting for a reply from a filesystem.
That means a hung filesystem can block codepaths that use
exec_update_lock; and it also means that a FUSE filesystem which
attempts to inspect the calling process can deadlock.
To avoid such problems, move do_close_on_exec() before the
exec_update_lock is taken, but after the FD table has been copied if
necessary.
I have looked through all the calls between the old and new position of
the do_close_on_exec() call; there seems to be no file descriptor table
access in between.
Reported-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@locrian.net>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f5e8166a-88be-46c5-8939-1e5227ffe4c2@app.fastmail.com
Fixes: 6650527444da ("proc: protect ptrace_may_access() with exec_update_lock (part 1)")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260907-cloexec-before-exec-update-lock-v1-1-8018c201a7df@google.com
Tested-by: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@locrian.net>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/exec.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index 263b1f67f1f8..f419a512de63 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1162,6 +1162,20 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) goto out; /* + * We have to apply CLOEXEC before we change whether the process is + * dumpable (in setup_new_exec) to avoid a race with a process in userspace + * trying to access the should-be-closed file descriptors of a process + * undergoing exec(2). + * + * This can block on filesystem ->flush() handlers, including waiting + * for FUSE daemons, so do it before exec_mmap takes the + * exec_update_lock. + * This must happen after the point of no return, and after unsharing + * the FD table. + */ + do_close_on_exec(me->files); + + /* * Must be called _before_ exec_mmap() as bprm->mm is * not visible until then. Doing it here also ensures * we don't race against replace_mm_exe_file(). @@ -1211,14 +1225,6 @@ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) clear_syscall_work_syscall_user_dispatch(me); - /* - * We have to apply CLOEXEC before we change whether the process is - * dumpable (in setup_new_exec) to avoid a race with a process in userspace - * trying to access the should-be-closed file descriptors of a process - * undergoing exec(2). - */ - do_close_on_exec(me->files); - if (bprm->secureexec) { /* Make sure parent cannot signal privileged process. */ me->pdeath_signal = 0; |
