| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
One of the stated goals of git-replay(1) is to allow implementing the
git-rebase(1) functionality on the server side.
The default mode of git-rebase(1) is to act as if `--no-rebase-merges`
was given. This mode drops merge commits instead of replaying them, and
linearizes the history into a sequence of regular (single-parent)
commits.
Add option `--linearize` to git-replay(1) to do the same. Each replayed
commit is stacked on top of the previously replayed one. When a merge is
encountered, the commits reachable from all of its sides are replayed
into the single line and the merge itself is dropped.
If a ref was pointing to a merge commit, that ref is updated to the
merge's last replayed ancestor.
git-replay(1) accepts multiple branches, for example:
$ git replay --onto main topic1 topic2
Without `--linearize` this replays 'topic1' and 'topic2' onto 'main'
(keeping shared portions of history shared and divergent parts
divergent) and updates both refs.
Due to current implementation limitations, replaying multiple branches
with `--linearize` is disallowed to avoid concatenating unrelated
histories into a single line. For the same reason disallow the use of
`--contained` with `--linearize`.
Users who want to linearize multiple branches are advised to do this in
separate git-replay(1) invocations. Linearizing multiple branches at
once might be added later.
Note that `--linearize` is not modeled after git-rebase(1)'s
`--rebase-merges[=<mode>]` interface. Recreating merges, by preserving
their topology, is a distinct operation that would be a separate mode.
`--linearize` only drops merges and replays commits linearly. So
git-replay(1) uses its own option rather than reusing that interface.
Based-on-patches-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The experimental 'git history' command has been taught a new 'drop'
subcommand to remove a commit, with its descendants replayed onto its
parent.
* ps/history-drop:
builtin/history: implement "drop" subcommand
builtin/history: split handling of ref updates into two phases
replay: expose `replay_result_queue_update()`
reset: stop assuming that the caller passes in a clean index
reset: allow the caller to specify the current HEAD object
reset: introduce ability to skip updating HEAD
reset: introduce dry-run mode
reset: modernize flags passed to `reset_working_tree()`
reset: rename `reset_head()`
reset: drop `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE`
read-cache: split out function to drop unmerged entries to stage 0
|
|
Expose `replay_result_queue_update()`, which is used to append another
reference update to the replay result. This function will be used in a
subsequent commit.
Suggested-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix some typos and grammar errors in comments and documentation files.
Signed-off-by: Tuomas Ahola <taahol@utu.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When replaying commits it may happen that some of the commits become
empty relative to their parent. Such commits are for now automatically
dropped by the replay subsystem without much control from the user.
Introduce a new enum that allows the caller to drop, keep or abort in
this case.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When option '--onto' is passed to git-replay(1), the command will update
refs from the <revision-range> passed to the command. When using option
'--advance' or '--revert', the argument of that option is a ref that
will be updated.
To enable users to specify which ref to update, add option '--ref'. When
using option '--ref', the refs described above are left untouched and
instead the argument of this option is updated instead.
Because this introduces code paths in replay.c that jump to `out` before
init_basic_merge_options() is called on `merge_opt`, zero-initialize the
struct.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a `--revert <branch>` mode to git replay that undoes the changes
introduced by the specified commits. Like --onto and --advance, --revert
is a standalone mode: it takes a branch argument and updates that branch
with the newly created revert commits.
At GitLab, we need this in Gitaly for reverting commits directly on bare
repositories without requiring a working tree checkout.
The approach is the same as sequencer.c's do_pick_commit() -- cherry-pick
and revert are just the same three-way merge with swapped arguments:
- Cherry-pick: merge(ancestor=parent, ours=current, theirs=commit)
- Revert: merge(ancestor=commit, ours=current, theirs=parent)
We swap the base and pickme trees passed to merge_incore_nonrecursive()
to reverse the diff direction.
Reverts are processed newest-first (matching git revert behavior) to
reduce conflicts by peeling off changes from the top. Each revert
builds on the result of the previous one via the last_commit fallback
in the main replay loop, rather than relying on the parent-mapping
used for cherry-pick.
Revert commit messages follow the usual git revert conventions: prefixed
with "Revert" (or "Reapply" when reverting a revert), and including
"This reverts commit <hash>.". The author is set to the current user
rather than preserving the original author, matching git revert behavior.
Helped-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Move the core logic used to replay commits into "libgit.a" so that it
can be easily reused by other commands. It will be used in a subsequent
commit where we're about to introduce a new git-history(1) command.
Note that with this change we have no sign-comparison warnings anymore,
and neither do we depend on `the_repository`.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|