| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
During a conflicted merge, rebase, or cherry-pick, 'git add -u' is a
handy way to add modified paths to the index. However, '-u'
indiscriminately adds all modified tracked paths, including unmerged
paths that may still contain unresolved conflict markers. It also
adds tracked files modified in the worktree that are not involved in
the ongoing merge.
The latter is not a huge problem for "git rebase", which refuses to
start with any local changes, but is a problem for "git merge",
which is often run with local changes in maintainer workflows.
Introduce 'git add --resolved' to add only unmerged paths, limited
by an optional pathspec, where no conflict markers remain in the
working tree.
Before modifying the index, scan unmerged regular files for leftover
conflict markers using a new helper, has_conflict_markers(), defined
in merge-ll.c in terms of the is_conflict_marker_line() helper we
introduced earlier. If any unmerged path still contains conflict
markers, show an error listing the conflicted paths and abort
without updating the index. Otherwise, add these unmerged paths
that do not have conflict markers to the index.
Note that unmerged paths without conflict markers (such as binary
files and deletions) are added as resolved using add_file_to_index()
and remove_file_from_index_with_flags(). Tracked files that were
not in a conflicted state are ignored by '--resolved'.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The diff.c:is_conflict_marker() and rerere.c:is_cmarker() functions
implement duplicate logic for identifying conflict marker lines
(lines that begin with a run of '<', '=', '>', and '|' characters).
diff.c's original version from 049540435f (diff --check: detect
leftover conflict markers, 2008-06-26) accepts any whitespace (such
as a newline) immediately following '<<<<<<<' and '>>>>>>>', whereas
rerere.c's version from 191f241717 (rerere: prepare for customizable
conflict marker length, 2010-01-16) strictly requires a space
character (' ') after them.
Implement is_conflict_marker_line() in merge-ll.c to serve as a
replacement for both, and update diff.c and rerere.c to use the new
helper. The unified helper intentionally adopts rerere's stricter
rule, as the conflicts generated by Git always show the "ours" and
"theirs" labels after these markers separated by a space.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a conflict_style member to `struct merge_options` and `struct
ll_merge_options` to allow callers to override the default conflict
style. This will be used in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Introduce a macro to initialize `struct ll_merge_options` in preparation
for the next commit that will add a new member that needs to be
initialized to a non-zero value.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A long term (but rather minor) pet-peeve of mine was the name
ll-merge.[ch]. I thought it made it harder to realize what stuff was
related to merging when I was working on the merge machinery and trying
to improve it.
Further, back in d1cbe1e6d8a ("hash-ll.h: split out of hash.h to remove
dependency on repository.h", 2023-04-22), we have split the portions of
hash.h that do not depend upon repository.h into a "hash-ll.h" (due to
the recommendation to use "ll" for "low-level" in its name[1], but which
I used as a suffix precisely because of my distaste for "ll-merge").
When we discussed adding additional "*-ll.h" files, a request was made
that we use "ll" consistently as either a prefix or a suffix. Since it
is already in use as both a prefix and a suffix, the only way to do so
is to rename some files.
Besides my distaste for the ll-merge.[ch] name, let me also note that
the files
ll-fsmonitor.h, ll-hash.h, ll-merge.h, ll-object-store.h, ll-read-cache.h
would have essentially nothing to do with each other and make no sense
to group. But giving them the common "ll-" prefix would group them. Using
"-ll" as a suffix thus seems just much more logical to me. Rename
ll-merge.[ch] to merge-ll.[ch] to achieve this consistency, and to
ensure we get a more logical grouping of files.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/kl6lsfcu1g8w.fsf@chooglen-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com/
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
