| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The 'git replay' command has been taught the '--linearize' option to
drop merge commits and linearize the replayed history, mimicking 'git
rebase --no-rebase-merges'.
* tc/replay-linearize:
replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology
replay: resolve the replay base outside pick_regular_commit()
replay: add helper to put entry into replayed_commits
|
|
One of the stated goals of git-replay(1) is to allow implementing the
git-rebase(1) functionality on the server side.
The default mode of git-rebase(1) is to act as if `--no-rebase-merges`
was given. This mode drops merge commits instead of replaying them, and
linearizes the history into a sequence of regular (single-parent)
commits.
Add option `--linearize` to git-replay(1) to do the same. Each replayed
commit is stacked on top of the previously replayed one. When a merge is
encountered, the commits reachable from all of its sides are replayed
into the single line and the merge itself is dropped.
If a ref was pointing to a merge commit, that ref is updated to the
merge's last replayed ancestor.
git-replay(1) accepts multiple branches, for example:
$ git replay --onto main topic1 topic2
Without `--linearize` this replays 'topic1' and 'topic2' onto 'main'
(keeping shared portions of history shared and divergent parts
divergent) and updates both refs.
Due to current implementation limitations, replaying multiple branches
with `--linearize` is disallowed to avoid concatenating unrelated
histories into a single line. For the same reason disallow the use of
`--contained` with `--linearize`.
Users who want to linearize multiple branches are advised to do this in
separate git-replay(1) invocations. Linearizing multiple branches at
once might be added later.
Note that `--linearize` is not modeled after git-rebase(1)'s
`--rebase-merges[=<mode>]` interface. Recreating merges, by preserving
their topology, is a distinct operation that would be a separate mode.
`--linearize` only drops merges and replays commits linearly. So
git-replay(1) uses its own option rather than reusing that interface.
Based-on-patches-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This is now a description list (see previous commit) and parentheticals
like this do not go on the left-hand side. Moving it to the other side
makes it stand out just as much and is also more consistent with the
rest of the documentation.
Let’s also do the same for the `replay.refAction` description list.
That makes the two desc. lists identical in the first sentence. Let’s
add a comment about that for future editors.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This bullet list for `--ref-action` introduces a term with a colon.
This is exactly what a description list is, structurally. Let’s be
stylistically consistent and use the desc. list markup construct.
In short, just transform this unordered list in the same way that we
did for `replay.refAction` in the previous commit.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
First of all, this unordered list for `replay.refAction` introduces
a term with a colon. This is exactly what a description list is,
structurally. Let’s be stylistically consistent and use the desc.
list markup construct. Let’s also drop the harmless but unneeded
indentation.
We can reuse the `::` delimiter since we use an open block.
But for consistency use the typical nested description list
delimiter, namely `;;`.
Second, let’s replace the inline-verbatim `git replay` with a link
to git-replay(1), since we are naming the command. But make that
conditional so that we avoid a self-link inside git-replay(1).[1]
† 1: See e.g. e7b3a768 (doc: git-init: rework config item
init.templateDir, 2024-03-10) for another example of
avoiding self-linking
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This config doc was added in 336ac90c (replay: add replay.refAction
config option, 2025-11-06) but never included anywhere. Include it in
git-replay(1) and git-config(1).
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When option '--onto' is passed to git-replay(1), the command will update
refs from the <revision-range> passed to the command. When using option
'--advance' or '--revert', the argument of that option is a ref that
will be updated.
To enable users to specify which ref to update, add option '--ref'. When
using option '--ref', the refs described above are left untouched and
instead the argument of this option is updated instead.
Because this introduces code paths in replay.c that jump to `out` before
init_basic_merge_options() is called on `merge_opt`, zero-initialize the
struct.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
gitcli(7) suggests to use stuck form. Change the documentation strings
to use this form.
While at it, reorder them to match the order in the docs.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a `--revert <branch>` mode to git replay that undoes the changes
introduced by the specified commits. Like --onto and --advance, --revert
is a standalone mode: it takes a branch argument and updates that branch
with the newly created revert commits.
At GitLab, we need this in Gitaly for reverting commits directly on bare
repositories without requiring a working tree checkout.
The approach is the same as sequencer.c's do_pick_commit() -- cherry-pick
and revert are just the same three-way merge with swapped arguments:
- Cherry-pick: merge(ancestor=parent, ours=current, theirs=commit)
- Revert: merge(ancestor=commit, ours=current, theirs=parent)
We swap the base and pickme trees passed to merge_incore_nonrecursive()
to reverse the diff direction.
Reverts are processed newest-first (matching git revert behavior) to
reduce conflicts by peeling off changes from the top. Each revert
builds on the result of the previous one via the last_commit fallback
in the main replay loop, rather than relying on the parent-mapping
used for cherry-pick.
Revert commit messages follow the usual git revert conventions: prefixed
with "Revert" (or "Reapply" when reverting a revert), and including
"This reverts commit <hash>.". The author is set to the current user
rather than preserving the original author, matching git revert behavior.
Helped-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git replay" is taught to drop commits that become empty (not the
ones that are empty in the original).
* pw/replay-drop-empty:
replay: drop commits that become empty
|
|
The rev-list options in our manuals are quite long; git-replay's manual
is no exception. Since replay doesn't use the formatting options at all
(it has its own output format), drop them.
This is the first time we have needed compound tests [1] for if[n]def in
our documentation:
git grep '^ifn\?def::' Documentation | grep '[,+]'
[1]: https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/directives/ifdef-ifndef/
For both ifdef and ifndef, the "," takes on the intuitive meaning:
- ifdef: if any of the listed attributes are set…
- ifndef: unless any of the listed attributes are set
(Use "+" for "all".)
Signed-off-by: D. Ben Knoble <ben.knoble+github@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If the changes in a commit being replayed are already in the branch
that the commits are being replayed onto, then "git replay" creates an
empty commit. This is confusing because the commit message no longer
matches the contents of the commit. Drop the commit instead. Commits
that start off empty are not dropped. This matches the behavior of
"git rebase --reapply-cherry-pick --empty=drop" and "git cherry-pick
--empty-drop".
If a branch points to a commit that is dropped it will be updated
to point to the last commit that was not dropped. This can be seen
in the new test where "topic1" is updated to point to the rebased
"C" as "F" is dropped because it is already upstream. While this is
a breaking change, "git replay" is marked as experimental to allow
improvements like this that change the behavior.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git replay" documentation updates.
* kh/doc-replay-updates:
doc: replay: link section using markup
replay: improve --contained and add to doc
doc: replay: mention no output on conflicts
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There is no documentation for `--contained`.
Start by copying the text from `replay_options` in `builtin/
replay.c`. But some people think that the existing text is a
bit unclear; what does it mean for a branch to be contained
in a revision range? Let’s include the implied commits here:
the branches that point at commits in the range.
Also use “update” instead of “advance”. “Update” is the verb
commonly used in this context.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Some commands will produce output on stderr if there are conflicts, but
git-replay(1) is completely silent. Explicitly spell that out.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
There was significant confusion in the git-replay manual about what
constitutes a revision range. As noted in f302c1e4aa09 (revisions(7):
clarify that most commands take a single revision range, 2021-05-18):
Commands that are specifically designed to take two distinct ranges
(e.g. "git range-diff R1 R2" to compare two ranges) do exist, but they
are exceptions. Unless otherwise noted, all "git" commands that operate
on a set of commits work on a single revision range.
`git replay` is not an exception, but a few places in the manual were
written as though it were. These appear to have come in revisions to
the original series, between v3->v4 (see
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAP8UFD3bpLrVW97DH7j=V9H2GsTSAkksC9L3QujQERFk_kLnZA@mail.gmail.com/
, "More than one <revision-range> can be passed") and between v6->v7
(https://lore.kernel.org/git/20231115143327.2441397-1-christian.couder@gmail.com/,
"Takes ranges of commits"), and I missed both of these revisions when
reviewing. Fix them now.
There was also a reference to the "Commit Limiting options below", but
this page has no such section of options; strike the misleading
reference.
It is worth noting that we are documenting existing behavior, rather
than optimal behavior. Junio has multiple times suggested introducing
alternative ways to walk revisions and use them in `git replay
--advance`, e.g. at
* https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy1mqo6kv.fsf@gitster.g/
* https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqq8rb3is8c.fsf@gitster.g/
* https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqtsydj2zk.fsf@gitster.g/ (item (2))
If/when we introduce some new revision walking flag that implements one
of these alternate types of revision walks, we can update the --advance
option and this manual appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a configuration variable to control the default behavior of git replay
for updating references. This allows users who prefer the traditional
pipeline output to set it once in their config instead of passing
--ref-action=print with every command.
The config variable uses string values that mirror the behavior modes:
* replay.refAction = update (default): atomic ref updates
* replay.refAction = print: output commands for pipeline
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The git replay command currently outputs update commands that can be
piped to update-ref to achieve a rebase, e.g.
git replay --onto main topic1..topic2 | git update-ref --stdin
This separation had advantages for three special cases:
* it made testing easy (when state isn't modified from one step to
the next, you don't need to make temporary branches or have undo
commands, or try to track the changes)
* it provided a natural can-it-rebase-cleanly (and what would it
rebase to) capability without automatically updating refs, similar
to a --dry-run
* it provided a natural low-level tool for the suite of hash-object,
mktree, commit-tree, mktag, merge-tree, and update-ref, allowing
users to have another building block for experimentation and making
new tools
However, it should be noted that all three of these are somewhat
special cases; users, whether on the client or server side, would
almost certainly find it more ergonomic to simply have the updating
of refs be the default.
For server-side operations in particular, the pipeline architecture
creates process coordination overhead. Server implementations that need
to perform rebases atomically must maintain additional code to:
1. Spawn and manage a pipeline between git-replay and git-update-ref
2. Coordinate stdout/stderr streams across the pipe boundary
3. Handle partial failure states if the pipeline breaks mid-execution
4. Parse and validate the update-ref command output
Change the default behavior to update refs directly, and atomically (at
least to the extent supported by the refs backend in use). This
eliminates the process coordination overhead for the common case.
For users needing the traditional pipeline workflow, add a new
--ref-action=<mode> option that preserves the original behavior:
git replay --ref-action=print --onto main topic1..topic2 | git update-ref --stdin
The mode can be:
* update (default): Update refs directly using an atomic transaction
* print: Output update-ref commands for pipeline use
Test suite changes:
All existing tests that expected command output now use
--ref-action=print to preserve their original behavior. This keeps
the tests valid while allowing them to verify that the pipeline workflow
still works correctly.
New tests were added to verify:
- Default atomic behavior (no output, refs updated directly)
- Bare repository support (server-side use case)
- Equivalence between traditional pipeline and atomic updates
- Real atomicity using a lock file to verify all-or-nothing guarantee
- Test isolation using test_when_finished to clean up state
- Reflog messages include replay mode and target
A following commit will add a replay.refAction configuration
option for users who prefer the traditional pipeline output as their
default behavior.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Helped-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
