| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Both `compact` and `write --incremental` fix the base of the resulting
MIDX layer: `compact` always places the compacted result on top of
"from's" immediate parent in the chain, and `write --incremental` always
appends a new layer to the existing tip. In both cases the base is not
configurable.
Future callers need additional flexibility. For instance, the incremental
MIDX-based repacking code may wish to write a layer based on some
intermediate ancestor rather than the current tip, or produce a root
layer when replacing the bottommost entries in the chain.
Introduce a new `--base` option for both subcommands to specify the
checksum of the MIDX layer to use as the base. The given checksum must
refer to a valid layer in the MIDX chain that is an ancestor of the
topmost layer being written or compacted.
The special value "none" is accepted to produce a root layer with no
parent. This will be needed when the incremental repacking machinery
determines that the bottommost layers of the chain should be replaced.
If no `--base` is given, behavior is unchanged: `compact` uses "from's"
immediate parent in the chain, and `write` appends to the existing tip.
For the `write` subcommand, `--base` requires `--no-write-chain-file`. A plain
`write --incremental` appends a new layer to the live chain tip with no
mechanism to atomically replace it; overriding the base would produce a
layer that does not extend the tip, breaking chain invariants. With
`--no-write-chain-file` the chain is left unmodified and the caller is
responsible for assembling a valid chain.
For `compact`, no such restriction applies. The compaction operation
atomically replaces the compacted range in the chain file, so writing
the result on top of any valid ancestor preserves chain invariants.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When writing an incremental MIDX layer, the MIDX machinery writes the
new layer into the multi-pack-index.d directory and then updates the
multi-pack-index-chain file to include the freshly written layer.
Future callers however may not wish to immediately update the MIDX chain
itself, preferring instead to write out new layer(s) themselves before
atomically updating the chain. Concretely, the new incremental
MIDX-based repacking strategy will want to do exactly this (that is,
assemble the new MIDX chain itself before writing a new chain file and
atomically linking it into place).
Introduce a `--no-write-chain-file` flag that:
* writes the new MIDX layer into the multi-pack-index.d directory
* prints its checksum
* does not update the multi-pack-index-chain file.
The MIDX chain file (and thus, the lock protecting it) remain untouched,
allowing callers to assemble the chain themselves. This flag requires
`--incremental`, since the notion of a separate layer only makes sense
for incremental MIDXs.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We introduced midx version 2 in b2ec8e90c2 (midx: do not require packs
to be sorted in lexicographic order, 2026-02-24) and now write it by
default. The rationale was that older versions should ignore the v2 midx
and fall back to using the packs (just like we do for other midx
errors). Unfortunately this is not the case, as we have a hard die()
when we see an unknown midx version.
As a result, writing a midx with Git 2.54-rc2 puts the repository into a
state that is unusable with Git 2.53. And this midx write may happen
behind the scenes as part of normal operations, like fetch.
Let's switch back to writing v1 by default to avoid regressing the case
where multiple versions of Git are used on the same repository.
There is one gotcha, though: the v2 format is required for some new
features, like midx compaction, and running "git multi-pack-index
compact" will complain when asked to write a v1 index. The user must set
midx.version to "2" to make the feature work.
So instead of always using v1, we'll base the default on whether the
requested feature requires v2. That does mean that running midx
compaction will create a repository that can't be read by older versions
of Git. But we never do that by default; only people experimenting with
the new feature will be affected.
We have to adjust the test expectation in t5319, since it will now
generate v1 files. And our "auto-select v2" is covered by the tests in
t5335, which continue to check that compaction works without having to
set midx.version manually (and also explicitly check that asking for v1
with compaction reports the problem).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Enable callers to generate reachability bitmaps when performing MIDX
layer compaction by combining all existing bitmaps from the compacted
layers.
Note that because of the object/pack ordering described by the previous
commit, the pseudo-pack order for the compacted MIDX is the same as
concatenating the individual pseudo-pack orderings for each layer in the
compaction range.
As a result, the only non-test or documentation change necessary is to
treat all objects as non-preferred during compaction so as not to
disturb the object ordering.
In the future, we may want to adjust which commit(s) receive
reachability bitmaps when compacting multiple .bitmap files into one, or
even generate new bitmaps (e.g., if the references have moved
significantly since the .bitmap was generated). This commit only
implements combining all existing bitmaps in range together in order to
demonstrate and lay the groundwork for more exotic strategies.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When managing a MIDX chain with many layers, it is convenient to combine
a sequence of adjacent layers into a single layer to prevent the chain
from growing too long.
While it is conceptually possible to "compact" a sequence of MIDX layers
together by running "git multi-pack-index write --stdin-packs", there
are a few drawbacks that make this less than desirable:
- Preserving the MIDX chain is impossible, since there is no way to
write a MIDX layer that contains objects or packs found in an earlier
MIDX layer already part of the chain. So callers would have to write
an entirely new (non-incremental) MIDX containing only the compacted
layers, discarding all other objects/packs from the MIDX.
- There is (currently) no way to write a MIDX layer outside of the MIDX
chain to work around the above, such that the MIDX chain could be
reassembled substituting the compacted layers with the MIDX that was
written.
- The `--stdin-packs` command-line option does not allow us to specify
the order of packs as they appear in the MIDX. Therefore, even if
there were workarounds for the previous two challenges, any bitmaps
belonging to layers which come after the compacted layer(s) would no
longer be valid.
This commit introduces a way to compact a sequence of adjacent MIDX
layers into a single layer while preserving the MIDX chain, as well as
any bitmap(s) in layers which are newer than the compacted ones.
Implementing MIDX compaction does not require a significant number of
changes to how MIDX layers are written. The main changes are as follows:
- Instead of calling `fill_packs_from_midx()`, we call a new function
`fill_packs_from_midx_range()`, which walks backwards along the
portion of the MIDX chain which we are compacting, and adds packs one
layer a time.
In order to preserve the pseudo-pack order, the concatenated pack
order is preserved, with the exception of preferred packs which are
always added first.
- After adding entries from the set of packs in the compaction range,
`compute_sorted_entries()` must adjust the `pack_int_id`'s for all
objects added in each fanout layer to match their original
`pack_int_id`'s (as opposed to the index at which each pack appears
in `ctx.info`).
Note that we cannot reuse `midx_fanout_add_midx_fanout()` directly
here, as it unconditionally recurs through the `->base_midx`. Factor
out a `_1()` variant that operates on a single layer, reimplement
the existing function in terms of it, and use the new variant from
`midx_fanout_add_compact()`.
Since we are sorting the list of objects ourselves, the order we add
them in does not matter.
- When writing out the new 'multi-pack-index-chain' file, discard any
layers in the compaction range, replacing them with the newly written
layer, instead of keeping them and placing the new layer at the end
of the chain.
This ends up being sufficient to implement MIDX compaction in such a way
that preserves bitmaps corresponding to more recent layers in the MIDX
chain.
The tests for MIDX compaction are so far fairly spartan, since the main
interesting behavior here is ensuring that the right packs/objects are
selected from each layer, and that the pack order is preserved despite
whether or not they are sorted in lexicographic order in the original
MIDX chain.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since c39fffc1c90 (tests: start asserting that *.txt SYNOPSIS matches -h
output, 2022-10-13), the manual page for 'git multi-pack-index' has a
SYNOPSIS section which differs from 'git multi-pack-index -h'.
Correct this while also documenting additional options accepted by the
'write' sub-command.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since fcb2205b774 (midx: implement support for writing incremental MIDX
chains, 2024-08-06), the command-line options '--incremental' and
'--bitmap' were declared to be incompatible with one another when
running 'git multi-pack-index write'.
However, since 27afc272c49 (midx: implement writing incremental MIDX
bitmaps, 2025-03-20), that incompatibility no longer exists, despite the
documentation saying so. Correct this by removing the stale reference to
their incompatibility.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
All multi-pack-index sub-commands (write, verify, repack, and expire)
support a '--progress' command-line option, despite not listing it as
one of the common options in `common_opts`.
As a result each sub-command declares its own `OPT_BIT()` for a
"--progress" command-line option. Centralize this within the
`common_opts` to avoid re-declaring it in each sub-command.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Doc markup fixes.
* kh/doc-markup-fixes:
doc: remove extra backtick for inline-verbatim
doc: add missing backtick for inline-verbatim
|
|
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
For better searchability, this commit adds a check to ensure that parameters
expressed in the form of `--[no-]parameter` are not used in the
documentation. In the place of such parameters, the documentation should
list two separate parameters: `--parameter` and `--no-parameter`.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Clarify what happens when an object exists in more than one pack, but
not in the preferred pack. "git multi-pack-index repack" relies on ties
for objects that are not in the preferred pack being resolved in favor
of the newest pack that contains a copy of the object. If ties were
resolved in favor of the oldest pack as the current documentation
suggests the multi-pack index would not reference any of the objects in
the pack created by "git multi-pack-index repack".
Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not
wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc,
meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that
could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting.
It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files,
since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows
various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that
here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where
relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new
extension as well.
Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the
documentation.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
