summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-08-14clear_pattern_list(): clear embedded hashmapsJeff King1-0/+2
Commit 96cc8ab531 (sparse-checkout: use hashmaps for cone patterns, 2019-11-21) added some auxiliary hashmaps to the pattern_list struct, but they're leaked when clear_pattern_list() is called. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-14messages: avoid SHA-1 in end-user facing messagesJunio C Hamano5-5/+5
There are still a handful mentions of SHA-1 when we meant the (hexadecimal) object names in end-user facing messages. Rewrite them. I was hoping that this can mostly be s/SHA-1/object name/, but a few messages needed rephrasing to keep the result readable. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13docs: fix step in transition planbrian m. carlson1-1/+1
One of the required steps for the objectFormat extension is to implement the loose object index. However, without support for compatObjectFormat, we don't even know if the loose object index is needed, so it makes sense to move that step to the compatObjectFormat section. Do so. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13docs: document SHA-256 pack and indicesbrian m. carlson1-15/+21
Now that we have SHA-256 support for packs and indices, let's document that in SHA-256 repositories, we use SHA-256 instead of SHA-1 for object names and checksums. Instead of duplicating this information throughout the document, let's just document that in SHA-1 repositories, we use SHA-1 for these purposes, and in SHA-256 repositories, we use SHA-256. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13Seventh batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+9
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13Merge branch 'rp/blame-first-parent-doc'Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
The "git blame --first-parent" option was not documented, but now it is. * rp/blame-first-parent-doc: blame-options.txt: document --first-parent option
2020-08-13Merge branch 'ma/test-quote-cleanup'Junio C Hamano18-80/+53
Test cleanup. * ma/test-quote-cleanup: t4104: modernize and simplify quoting t: don't spuriously close and reopen quotes
2020-08-13Merge branch 'jt/has_object'Junio C Hamano7-10/+62
A new helper function has_object() has been introduced to make it easier to mark object existence checks that do and don't want to trigger lazy fetches, and a few such checks are converted using it. * jt/has_object: fsck: do not lazy fetch known non-promisor object pack-objects: no fetch when allow-{any,promisor} apply: do not lazy fetch when applying binary sha1-file: introduce no-lazy-fetch has_object()
2020-08-13Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Portability fix. * bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates: git-cvsexportcommit: support Perl before 5.10.1
2020-08-13rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todoAntti Keränen2-2/+9
'todo_list_write_to_file' may overwrite the static buffer, originating from 'find_unique_abbrev', that was used to store the short commit hash 'c' for "# Rebase a..b onto c" message in the todo editor. This is because the buffer that is returned from 'find_unique_abbrev' is valid until 4 more calls to `find_unique_abbrev` are made. As 'todo_list_write_to_file' calls 'find_unique_abbrev' for each rebased commit, the hash for 'c' is overwritten if there are 4 or more commits in the rebase. This behavior has been broken since its introduction. Fix by storing the short onto commit hash in a different buffer that remains valid, before calling 'todo_list_write_to_file'. Found-by: Jussi Keränen <jussike@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Antti Keränen <detegr@rbx.email> Acked-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13userdiff: improve Fortran xfuncname regexPhilippe Blain2-2/+1
The third part of the Fortran xfuncname regex wants to match the beginning of a subroutine or function, so it allows for all characters except `'`, `"` or whitespace before the keyword 'function' or 'subroutine'. This is meant to match the 'recursive', 'elemental' or 'pure' keywords, as well as function return types, and to prevent matches inside strings. However, the negated set does not contain the `!` comment character, so a line with an end-of-line comment containing the keyword 'function' or 'subroutine' followed by another word is mistakenly chosen as a hunk header. Improve the regex by adding `!` to the negated set. Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13userdiff: add tests for Fortran xfuncname regexPhilippe Blain11-0/+100
The Fortran userdiff patterns, introduced in 909a5494f8 (userdiff.c: add builtin fortran regex patterns, 2010-09-10), predate the test infrastructure for xfuncname patterns, introduced in bfa7d01413 (t4018: an infrastructure to test hunk headers, 2014-03-21). Add tests for the Fortran xfuncname patterns. The test 't/t4018/fortran-comment-keyword' documents a shortcoming of the regex that is fixed in a subsequent commit. While at it, add descriptive comments for the different parts of the regex. Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13fetch, pull doc: correct description of '--set-upstream'Philippe Blain1-1/+1
The '--set-upstream' option to `git fetch` (which is also accepted by `git pull` and passed through to the underlying `git fetch`) allows setting the upstream configuration for the current branch. This was added in 24bc1a1292 (pull, fetch: add --set-upstream option, 2019-08-19). However, the documentation for that option describes its action as 'If the remote is fetched successfully, pull and add upstream (tracking) reference [...]', which is wrong because this option does not cause neither `git fetch` nor `git pull` to pull: `git fetch` does not pull and `git pull` always pulls. Fix the description of that option. Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13docs: commit-graph: fix some whitespace in the diagramJohannes Berg1-3/+3
In the merge diagram, some whitespace is missing which makes it a bit confusing, fix that. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13ls-remote: simplify UNLEAK() usageJeff King1-5/+3
We UNLEAK() the "sorting" list created by parsing command-line options (which is essentially used until the program exits). But we do so right before leaving the cmd_ls_remote() function, which means we have to hit all of the exits. But the point of UNLEAK() is that it's an annotation which doesn't impact the variable itself. We can mark it as soon as we're done writing its value, and then we only have to do so once. This gives us a minor code reduction, and serves as a better example of how UNLEAK() can be used. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13stop calling UNLEAK() before die()Jeff King2-9/+3
The point of UNLEAK() is to make a reference to a variable that is about to go out of scope so that leak-checkers will consider it to be not-leaked. Doing so right before die() is therefore pointless; even though we are about to exit the program, the variable will still be on the stack and accessible to leak-checkers. These annotations aren't really hurting anything, but they clutter the code and set a bad example of how to use UNLEAK(). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13drop vcs-svn experimentJeff King24-3856/+7
The code in vcs-svn was started in 2010 as an attempt to build a remote-helper for interacting with svn repositories (as opposed to git-svn). However, we never got as far as shipping a mature remote helper, and the last substantive commit was e99d012a6bc in 2012. We do have a git-remote-testsvn, and it is even installed as part of "make install". But given the name, it seems unlikely to be used by anybody (you'd have to explicitly "git clone testsvn::$url", and there have been zero mentions of that on the mailing list since 2013, and even that includes the phrase "you might need to hack a bit to get it working properly"[1]). We also ship contrib/svn-fe, which builds on the vcs-svn work. However, it does not seem to build out of the box for me, as the link step misses some required libraries for using libgit.a. Curiously, the original build breakage bisects for me to eff80a9fd9 (Allow custom "comment char", 2013-01-16), which seems unrelated. There was an attempt to fix it in da011cb0e7 (contrib/svn-fe: fix Makefile, 2014-08-28), but on my system that only switches the error message. So it seems like the result is not really usable by anybody in practice. It would be wonderful if somebody wanted to pick up the topic again, and potentially it's worth carrying around for that reason. But the flip side is that people doing tree-wide operations have to deal with this code. And you can see the list with (replace "HEAD" with this commit as appropriate): { echo "--" git diff-tree --diff-filter=D -r --name-only HEAD^ HEAD } | git log --no-merges --oneline e99d012a6bc.. --stdin which shows 58 times somebody had to deal with the code, generally due to a compile or test failure, or a tree-wide style fix or API change. Let's drop it and let anybody who wants to pick it up do so by resurrecting it from the git history. As a bonus, this also reduces the size of a stripped installation of Git from 21MB to 19MB. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CALkWK0mPHzKfzFKKpZkfAus3YVC9NFYDbFnt+5JQYVKipk3bQQ@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13make git-fast-import a builtinJeff King5-8/+5
There's no reason that git-fast-import benefits from being a separate binary. And as it links against libgit.a, it has a non-trivial disk footprint. Let's make it a builtin, which reduces the size of a stripped installation from 22MB to 21MB. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13make git-bugreport a builtinJeff King5-16/+7
There's no reason that bugreport has to be a separate binary. And since it links against libgit.a, it has a rather large disk footprint. Let's make it a builtin, which reduces the size of a stripped installation from 24MB to 22MB. This also simplifies our Makefile a bit. And we can take advantage of builtin niceties like RUN_SETUP_GENTLY. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13make credential helpers builtinsJeff King7-35/+63
There's no real reason for credential helpers to be separate binaries. I did them this way originally under the notion that helper don't _need_ to be part of Git, and so can be built totally separately (and indeed, the ones in contrib/credential are). But the ones in our main Makefile build on libgit.a, and the resulting binaries are reasonably large. We can slim down our total disk footprint by just making them builtins. This reduces the size of: make strip install from 29MB to 24MB on my Debian system. Note that credential-cache can't operate without support for Unix sockets. Currently we just don't build it at all when NO_UNIX_SOCKETS is set. We could continue that with conditionals in the Makefile and our list of builtins. But instead, let's build a dummy implementation that dies with an informative message. That has two advantages: - it's simpler, because the conditional bits are all kept inside the credential-cache source - a user who is expecting it to exist will be told _why_ they can't use it, rather than getting the "credential-cache is not a git command" error which makes it look like the Git install is broken. Note that our dummy implementation does still respond to "-h" in order to appease t0012 (and this may be a little friendlier for users, as well). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13Makefile: drop builtins from MSVC pdb listJeff King1-2/+0
Over the years some more programs have become builtins, but nobody updated this MSVC-specific section of the file (which specifically says that it should not include builtins). Let's bring it up to date. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13blame: only coalesce lines that are adjacent in resultJeff King2-0/+10
After blame has finished but before we produce any output, we coalesce groups of lines that were adjacent in the original suspect (which may have been split apart by lines in intermediate commits which went away). However, this can cause incorrect output if the lines are not also adjacent in the result. For instance, the case in t8003 has: ABC DEF which becomes ABC SPLIT DEF Blaming only lines 1 and 3 in the result yields two blame groups (one for each line) that were adjacent in the original. That's enough for us to coalesce them into a single group, but that loses information: our output routines assume they're adjacent in the result as well, and we output: <oid> 1) ABC <oid> 2) SPLIT This is nonsense for two reasons: - we were asked about line 3, not line 2; we should not output the SPLIT line at all - commit <oid> did not touch the SPLIT line at all! We found the correct blame for line 3, but the bug is actually in the output stage, which is showing the wrong line number and content from the final file. We can fix this by only coalescing when both the suspect and result lines are adjacent. That fixes this bug, but keeps coalescing in cases where want it (e.g., the existing test in t8003 where SPLIT goes away, and the lines really are adjacent in the result). Reported-by: Nuthan Munaiah <nm6061@rit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13t8003: factor setup out of coalesce testJeff King1-6/+10
In preparation for adding more tests of blame's coalesce code, let's split the setup out from the first test, and give each of the commits a more meaningful name: - $orig for the original source that added the lines - $split for the version where they are split apart - $final for the final version that re-joins them That's not strictly necessary, but makes the follow-on tests less brittle than relying on HEAD^, etc, to name the commits. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13t8003: check output of coalesced blameJeff King1-7/+4
Commit f0cbe742f4 (blame: add a test to cover blame_coalesce(), 2019-06-20) added a test case where blame can usefully coalesce two groups of lines. But since it relies on the normal blame output, it only exercises the code and can't tell whether the lines were actually joined into a single group. However, by using --porcelain output, we can see how git-blame considers the groupings (and likewise how the coalescing might have a real user-visible impact for a tool that uses the porcelain-output groupings). This lets us confirm that we are indeed coalescing correctly (and the fact that this test case requires coalescing can be verified by dropping the call to blame_coalesce(), causing the test to fail). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12submodule: port submodule subcommand 'summary' from shell to CPrathamesh Chavan3-186/+431
Convert submodule subcommand 'summary' to a builtin and call it via 'git-submodule.sh'. The shell version had to call $diff_cmd twice, once to find the modified modules cared by the user and then again, with that list of modules to do various operations for computing the summary of those modules. On the other hand, the C version does not need a second call to $diff_cmd since it reuses the module list from the first call to do the aforementioned tasks. In the C version, we use the combination of setting a child process' working directory to the submodule path and then calling 'prepare_submodule_repo_env()' which also sets the 'GIT_DIR' to '.git', so that we can be certain that those spawned processes will not access the superproject's ODB by mistake. A behavioural difference between the C and the shell version is that the shell version outputs two line feeds after the 'git log' output when run outside of the tests while the C version outputs one line feed in any case. The reason for this is that the shell version calls log with '--pretty=format:<fmt>' whose output is followed by two echo calls; 'format' does not have "terminator" semantics like its 'tformat' counterpart. So, the log output is terminated by a newline only when invoked by the user and not when invoked from the scripts. This results in the one & two line feed differences in the shell version. On the other hand, the C version calls log with '--pretty=<fmt>' which is equivalent to '--pretty:tformat:<fmt>' which is then followed by a 'printf("\n")'. Due to its "terminator" semantics the log output is always terminated by newline and hence one line feed in any case. Also, when we try to pass an option-like argument after a non-option argument, for instance: git submodule summary HEAD --foo-bar (or) git submodule summary HEAD --cached That argument would be treated like a path to the submodule for which the user is requesting a summary. So, the option ends up having no effect. Though, passing '--quiet' is an exception to this: git submodule summary HEAD --quiet While 'summary' doesn't support '--quiet', we don't get an output for the above command as '--quiet' is treated as a path which means we get an output only if a submodule whose path is '--quiet' exists. The error message in case of computing a summary for non-existent submodules in the C version is different from that of the shell version. Since the new error message is not marked for translation, change the 'test_i18ngrep' in t7421.4 to 'grep'. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mentored-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com> Mentored-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Chavan <pc44800@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12t7421: introduce a test script for verifying 'summary' outputShourya Shukla2-0/+73
't7401-submodule-summary.sh' uses 'git add' to add submodules. Therefore, some commands such as 'git submodule init' and 'git submodule deinit' do not work as expected. So, introduce a test script for verifying the 'summary' output for submodules added using 'git submodule add' and notify regarding the above mentioned behaviour in t7401 itself. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mentored-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12submodule: rename helper functions to avoid ambiguityShourya Shukla3-7/+7
The helper functions: show_submodule_summary(), prepare_submodule_summary() and print_submodule_summary() are used by the builtin_diff() function in diff.c to generate a summary of submodules in the context of a diff. Functions with similar names are to be introduced in the upcoming port of submodule's summary subcommand. So, rename the helper functions to '*_diff_submodule_summary()' to avoid ambiguity. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mentored-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12submodule: remove extra line feeds between callback struct and macroShourya Shukla1-3/+0
Many `submodule--helper` subcommands follow the convention that a struct defines their callback data, and the declaration of that struct is followed immediately by a macro to use in static initializers, without any separating empty line. Let's align the `init`, `status` and `sync` subcommands with that convention. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mentored-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Helped-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> Signed-off-by: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12dir: avoid prematurely marking nonbare repositories as matchesElijah Newren2-3/+22
Nonbare repositories are special directories. Unlike normal directories that we might recurse into to list the files they contain, nonbare repositories must themselves match and then we always report only on the nonbare repository directory itself and not on any of its contents. Separately, when traversing directories to try to find untracked or excluded files, we often think in terms of paths either matching the specified pathspec, or not matching them. However, there is a special value that do_match_pathspec() uses named MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC which means "this directory does not match any pathspec BUT it is possible a file or directory underneath it does." That special value prevents us from prematurely thinking that some directory and everything under it is irrelevant, but also allows us to differentiate from "this is a match". The combination of these two special cases was previously uncovered. Add a test to the testsuite to cover it, and make sure that we return a nonbare repository as a non-match if the best match it got was MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC. Reported-by: christian w <usebees@gmail.com> Simplified-testcase-and-bisection-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12t3000: fix some test description typosElijah Newren1-4/+4
There is no such flag as --o; it is either --others or -o. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12rebase: remove unused function reschedule_last_actionRené Scharfe1-10/+0
The only caller of reschedule_last_action was removed by ef64bb328df (rebase: strip unused code in git-rebase--preserve-merges.sh, 2018-05-28); remove this unused shell function as well. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11Sixth batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+11
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11Merge branch 'ss/cmake-build'Junio C Hamano2-15/+1024
CMake support to build with MSVC for Windows bypassing the Makefile. * ss/cmake-build: ci: modification of main.yml to use cmake for vs-build job cmake: support for building git on windows with msvc and clang. cmake: support for building git on windows with mingw cmake: support for testing git when building out of the source tree cmake: support for testing git with ctest cmake: installation support for git cmake: generate the shell/perl/python scripts and templates, translations Introduce CMake support for configuring Git
2020-08-11Merge branch 'tb/upload-pack-filters'Junio C Hamano5-0/+184
The component to respond to "git fetch" request is made more configurable to selectively allow or reject object filtering specification used for partial cloning. * tb/upload-pack-filters: t5616: use test_i18ngrep for upload-pack errors upload-pack.c: introduce 'uploadpackfilter.tree.maxDepth' upload-pack.c: allow banning certain object filter(s) list_objects_filter_options: introduce 'list_object_filter_config_name'
2020-08-11Merge branch 'es/worktree-doc-cleanups'Junio C Hamano1-61/+62
Doc cleanup around "worktree". * es/worktree-doc-cleanups: git-worktree.txt: link to man pages when citing other Git commands git-worktree.txt: make start of new sentence more obvious git-worktree.txt: fix minor grammatical issues git-worktree.txt: consistently use term "working tree" git-worktree.txt: employ fixed-width typeface consistently
2020-08-11Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-part-3'Junio C Hamano74-351/+633
The final leg of SHA-256 transition. * bc/sha-256-part-3: (39 commits) t: remove test_oid_init in tests docs: add documentation for extensions.objectFormat ci: run tests with SHA-256 t: make SHA1 prerequisite depend on default hash t: allow testing different hash algorithms via environment t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithm repository: enable SHA-256 support by default setup: add support for reading extensions.objectformat bundle: add new version for use with SHA-256 builtin/verify-pack: implement an --object-format option http-fetch: set up git directory before parsing pack hashes t0410: mark test with SHA1 prerequisite t5308: make test work with SHA-256 t9700: make hash size independent t9500: ensure that algorithm info is preserved in config t9350: make hash size independent t9301: make hash size independent t9300: use $ZERO_OID instead of hard-coded object ID t9300: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t8011: make hash size independent ...
2020-08-11t/t4013: add test for --diff-merges=offSergey Organov3-0/+158
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11doc/git-log: describe --diff-merges=offSergey Organov1-1/+5
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11revision: change "--diff-merges" option to require parameterSergey Organov1-1/+8
--diff-merges=off is the only accepted form for now, a synonym for --no-diff-merges. This patch is a preparation for adding more values, as well as supporting --diff-merges=<parent>, where <parent> is single parent number to output diff against. Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11t1416: avoid hard-coded sha1 idsJeff King1-2/+3
The test added by e5256c82e5 (refs: fix interleaving hook calls with reference-transaction hook, 2020-08-07) uses hard-coded sha1 object ids in its expected output. This causes it to fail when run with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256. Let's make use of the oid variables we define earlier, as the rest of the nearby tests do. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11multi-pack-index: repack batches below --batch-sizeDerrick Stolee3-6/+25
The --batch-size=<size> option of 'git multi-pack-index repack' is intended to limit the amount of work done by the repack. In the case of a large repository, this command should repack a number of small pack-files but leave the large pack-files alone. Most often, the repository has one large pack-file from a 'git clone' operation and number of smaller pack-files from incremental 'git fetch' operations. The issue with '--batch-size' is that it also _prevents_ the repack from happening if the expected size of the resulting pack-file is too small. This was intended as a way to avoid frequent churn of small pack-files, but it has mostly caused confusion when a repository is of "medium" size. That is, not enormous like the Windows OS repository, but also not so small that this incremental repack isn't valuable. The solution presented here is to collect pack-files for repack if their expected size is smaller than the batch-size parameter until either the total expected size exceeds the batch-size or all pack-files are considered. If there are at least two pack-files, then these are combined to a new pack-file whose size should not be too much larger than the batch-size. This new strategy should succeed in keeping the number of pack-files small in these "medium" size repositories. The concern about churn is likely not interesting, as the real control over that is the frequency in which the repack command is run. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11upload-pack: remove superfluous sigchain_pop() callRené Scharfe1-1/+0
2997178ee6 (upload-pack: split check_unreachable() in two, prep for get_reachable_list(), 2016-06-12) moved most code of has_unreachable() into the new function do_reachable_revlist(). The latter takes care to ignore SIGPIPE during its operations, and restores the original signal handler before returning. However, a sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE) call remained in the error handling code of has_unreachable(), which does nothing because the stack is empty after do_reachable_revlist() cleaned up after itself. Remove it. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6425: be more flexible with rename/delete conflict messagesElijah Newren1-1/+2
t6425 was very picky about the exact output message produced by a rename/delete conflict, in a way that just scratches the surface of the mess that was built into merge-recursive. The idea was that it would try to find the possible combinations of different conflict types, and when more than one was present for one path, it would try to provide a combined message that covered all the cases. There's a lot to unravel here... First, there's a basic conflict type known as modify/delete, which is a content conflict. It occurs when one side deletes a file, but the other modifies it. There is also a path conflict known as a rename/delete. This occurs when one side deletes a path, and the other renames it. This is not a content conflict, it is a path conflict. It will often occur in combination with a content conflict, though, namely a modify/delete. As such, these two were often combined. Another type of conflict that can exist is a directory/file conflict. For example, one side adds a new file at some path, and the other side of history adds a directory at the same path. The path that was "added" could have been put there by a rename, though. Thus, we have the possibility of a single path being affected by a modify/delete, a rename/delete, and a directory/file conflict. In part, this was a natural by-product of merge-recursive's design. Since it was doing a four way merge with the contents of the working tree being the fourth factor it had to consider, it had working tree handling spread all over the code. It also had directory/file conflict handling spread everywhere through all the other types of conflicts. And our testsuite has a huge number of directory/file conflict tests because trying to get them right required modifying so many different codepaths. A natural outgrowth of this kind of structure is conflict messages that combine all the different types that the current codepath is considering. However, if we want to make the different conflict types orthogonal and avoid repeating ourselves and getting very brittle code, then we need to split the messages from these different conflict types apart. Besides, trying to determine all possible permutations is a _royal_ mess. The code to handle the rename/delete/directory/file conflict output is already somewhat hard to parse, and is somewhat brittle. But if we really wanted to go that route, then we'd have to have special handling for the following types of combinations: * rename/add/delete: on side of history that didn't rename the given file, remove the file instead and place an unrelated file in the way of the rename * rename/rename(2to1)/mode conflict/delete/delete: two different files, one executable and the other not, are renamed to the same location, each side deletes the source file that the other side renames * rename/rename(1to2)/add/add: file renamed differently on each side of history, with each side placing an unrelated file in the way of the other * rename/rename(1to2)/content conflict/file location/(D/F)/(D/F)/: both sides modify a file in conflicting way, both rename that file but to different paths, one side renames the directory which the other side had renamed that file into causing it to possibly need a transitive rename, and each side puts a directory in the way of the other's path. Let's back away from this path of insanity, and allow the different types of conflicts to be handled by separate pieces of non-repeated code by allowing the conflict messages to be split into their separate types. (If multiple conflict types affect a single path, the conflict messages can be printed sequentially.) Start this path with a simple change: modify this test to be more flexible and accept the output either merge backend (recursive or the new ort) will produce. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renamesElijah Newren2-8/+14
Much like the last commit accepted 'add/add' and 'rename/add' interchangably, we also want to do the same for 'add/add' and 'rename/rename'. This also allows us to avoid the ambiguity in meaning with 'rename/rename' (is it two separate files renamed to the same location, or one file renamed on both sides but differently)? Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6422, t6426: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving renamesElijah Newren2-9/+14
merge-recursive treats an add/add conflict where one of the adds came from a rename as a separate 'rename/add' type of conflict. However, if there is not content conflict after the content merge(s), then the file is not considered to be conflicted. That suggests the conflict type is really just add/add. Other merge engines might choose to print messages to the console that just refer to these as add/add conflicts; accept both types of output. Note: it could help to notify users if the three-way content merge of the rename had content conflicts, because when we then go to two-way merge THAT with the conflicting add we can get nested conflict markers. merge-recursive, unfortunately, doesn't do that, but other merge engines could. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6423: add an explanation about why one of the tests does not passElijah Newren1-0/+8
I had long since forgotten the idea behind this test and why it failed, and took a little while to figure it out. To prevent others from having to spend a similar time on it, add an explanation in the comments. However, the reasoning in the explanation makes me question why I considered it a failure at all. I'm not sure if I had a better reason when I originally wrote it, but for now just add commentary about the possible expectations and why it behaves the way it does right now. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6416, t6423: clarify some comments and fix some typosElijah Newren2-14/+13
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6422: fix multiple errors with the mod6 test expectationsElijah Newren1-9/+10
This test had multiple issues causing it to fail for the wrong reason(s): * rename/rename(1to2) conflicts have always left the original source path present in the working directory and index (at stage 1). Thus, the triple rename/rename(1to2) should result in 9 unstaged files, not 6. * It messed up the three-way content merge for checking the results of merging for one of the renames, accidentally turning it into a two-way merge. * It got the contents of the base files it was using to compare against wrong, due to an off-by-one error, and overwrite-redirection ('>') instead of append-redirection ('>>'). * It used slightly too-long conflict markers * It didn't include filenames in the conflict marker hunks (granted, that was a shortcoming of the merge-recursive backend for rename/add and rename/rename(2to1) conflicts, but since it's test_expect_failure anyway we might as well make it expect our preferred behavior rather than some compromise that we can't yet reach anyway). Fix these issues so that a merge backend which correctly handles these kinds of nested conflicts will pass the test. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6423: fix test setup for a couple testsElijah Newren1-0/+2
Commit da1e295e00 ("t604[236]: do not run setup in separate tests", 2019-10-22) removed approximately half the tests (which were setup-only tests) in t6043 by turning them into functions that the subsequent test would call as their first step. This ensured that any test from this file could be run entirely independently of all the other tests in the file. Unfortunately, the call to the new setup function was missed in two of the test_expect_failure cases. Add them in. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6416, t6422: fix incorrect untracked file countElijah Newren2-3/+3
Apparently I don't know how to count untracked files, and since the tests in question were marked as test_expect_failure, no one ever noticed it until now. Correct the count, as these tests clearly create three untracked files ('out', 'err', and 'file_count'). (I believe this problem arose because earlier incarnations counted lines via a pipe to 'wc -l'. Reviewers asked that it be replaced by writing the output to a file and using test_line_count, but when the temporary output was added to a separate file, the count of untracked files should have increased.) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>