summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-11-19t3[5-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin16-126/+126
This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t3[5-9]*.sh) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t34*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin23-253/+253
Carefully excluding t3404, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch name in t34*. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t34*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t34\*) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t3416: preemptively adjust alignment in a commentJohannes Schindelin1-1/+1
We are about to adjust t3416 for the new default branch name `main`. This name is two characters shorter and therefore needs two spaces more padding to align correctly. Adjusting the alignment before the big search-and-replace makes it easier to verify that the final result does not leave any misaligned lines behind. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t3[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin16-240/+240
Carefully excluding t3040, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t3[0-3]*.sh t3206/* && git checkout HEAD -- t3040\*) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t2*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin19-219/+219
Carefully excluding t2106, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -- t2*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t2106\*) This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t[01]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin44-394/+394
Carefully excluding t1309, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- t[01]*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t1309\*) Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`) that we rename here, too. This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t0060: preemptively adjust alignmentJohannes Schindelin1-2/+2
We are about to adjust t0060 for the new default branch name `main`. This name is two characters shorter and therefore needs two spaces more padding to align correctly. Adjusting the alignment before the big search-and-replace makes it easier to verify that the final result does not leave any misaligned lines behind. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin325-0/+974
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19Merge 'jk/diff-release-filespec-fix' into ↵Junio C Hamano2-0/+16
js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch * jk/diff-release-filespec-fix: t7800: simplify difftool test diff: allow passing NULL to diff_free_filespec_data()
2020-11-19pull: colorize the hint about setting `pull.rebase`Johannes Schindelin2-14/+17
In d18c950a69f (pull: warn if the user didn't say whether to rebase or to merge, 2020-03-09), a new hint was introduced to encourage users to make a conscious decision about whether they want their pull to merge or to rebase by configuring the `pull.rebase` setting. This warning was clearly intended to advise users, but as pointed out in https://lore.kernel.org/git/87ima2rdsm.fsf%40evledraar.gmail.com, it uses `warning()` instead of `advise()`. One consequence is that the advice is not colorized in the same manner as other, similar messages. So let's use `advise()` instead. Pointed-out-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t4015: let the test pass with any default branch nameJohannes Schindelin1-3/+3
We do not need to hard-code the actual branch name, as we can use the `test_commit` function to simplify the code and use the tag it generates, thereby being a lot more precise in what we want. Strangely enough, this test case would have succeeded even with an overridden default branch name, obviously for the wrong reason. Let's verify that it passes for the expected reason, by looking for a tell-tale in Git's output. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t1309: use a neutral branch name in the `onbranch` test casesJohannes Schindelin1-2/+2
The `onbranch` test cases touched by this patch do not actually try to include any other config. Their purpose is to avoid regressing on two bugs in the `include.onbranch:<name>.path` code that we fixed in the past, bugs that are actually unrelated to any concrete branch name. The first bug was fixed in 85fe0e800ca (config: work around bug with includeif:onbranch and early config, 2019-07-31). Essentially, when reading early config, there would be a catch-22 trying to access the refs, and therefore we simply cannot evaluate the condition at that point. The test case ensures that we avoid emitting this bogus message: BUG: refs.c:1851: attempting to get main_ref_store outside of repository The second test case concerns the non-Git scenario, where we simply do not have a current branch to begin with (because we don't have a repository in the first place), and the test case was introduced in 22932d9169f (config: stop checking whether the_repository is NULL, 2019-08-06) to ensure that we don't cause a segmentation fault should the code still incorrectly try to look at any ref. In short, neither of these two test cases will ever look at a current branch name, even in case of regressions. Therefore, the actual branch name does not matter at all. We can therefore easily avoid racially-charged branch names here, and that's what this patch does. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18gc: fix cast in compare_tasks_by_selection()René Scharfe1-4/+2
compare_tasks_by_selection() is used with QSORT and gets passed pointers to the elements of "static struct maintenance_task tasks[]". It casts the *addresses* of these passed pointers to element pointers, though, and thus effectively compares some unrelated values from the stack. Fix the casts to actually compare array elements. Detected by USan (make SANITIZE=undefined test). Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18Sixth batchJunio C Hamano1-0/+35
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18Merge branch 'jc/blame-ignore-fix'Junio C Hamano2-4/+5
"git blame --ignore-revs-file=<file>" learned to ignore a non-existent object name in the input, instead of complaining. * jc/blame-ignore-fix: blame: silently ignore invalid ignore file objects
2020-11-18Merge branch 'jc/sparse-error-for-developer-build'Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
"make DEVELOPER=1 sparse" used to run sparse and let it emit warnings; now such warnings will cause an error. * jc/sparse-error-for-developer-build: Makefile: enable -Wsparse-error for DEVELOPER build
2020-11-18Merge branch 'pb/blame-funcname-range-userdiff'Junio C Hamano12-72/+79
"git blame -L :funcname -- path" did not work well for a path for which a userdiff driver is defined. * pb/blame-funcname-range-userdiff: blame: simplify 'setup_blame_bloom_data' interface blame: simplify 'setup_scoreboard' interface blame: enable funcname blaming with userdiff driver line-log: mention both modes in 'blame' and 'log' short help doc: add more pointers to gitattributes(5) for userdiff blame-options.txt: also mention 'funcname' in '-L' description doc: line-range: improve formatting doc: log, gitk: move '-L' description to 'line-range-options.txt'
2020-11-18Merge branch 'en/merge-ort-api-null-impl'Junio C Hamano13-15/+517
Preparation for a new merge strategy. * en/merge-ort-api-null-impl: merge,rebase,revert: select ort or recursive by config or environment fast-rebase: demonstrate merge-ort's API via new test-tool command merge-ort-wrappers: new convience wrappers to mimic the old merge API merge-ort: barebones API of new merge strategy with empty implementation
2020-11-18Merge branch 'ds/maintenance-part-3'Junio C Hamano17-8/+759
Parts of "git maintenance" to ease writing crontab entries (and other scheduling system configuration) for it. * ds/maintenance-part-3: maintenance: add troubleshooting guide to docs maintenance: use 'incremental' strategy by default maintenance: create maintenance.strategy config maintenance: add start/stop subcommands maintenance: add [un]register subcommands for-each-repo: run subcommands on configured repos maintenance: add --schedule option and config maintenance: optionally skip --auto process
2020-11-18Merge branch 'pw/rebase-i-orig-head'Junio C Hamano4-22/+31
"git rebase -i" did not store ORIG_HEAD correctly. * pw/rebase-i-orig-head: rebase -i: simplify get_revision_ranges() rebase -i: use struct object_id when writing state rebase -i: use struct object_id rather than looking up commit rebase -i: stop overwriting ORIG_HEAD buffer
2020-11-18Merge branch 'rs/archive-high-compression'Junio C Hamano3-16/+14
"git archive" now allows compression level higher than "-9" when generating tar.gz output. * rs/archive-high-compression: archive: support compression levels beyond 9
2020-11-18Merge branch 'dg/bswap-msvc'Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Define ARM64 compiled with MSVC to be little-endian. * dg/bswap-msvc: compat/bswap.h: don't assume MSVC is little-endian compat/bswap.h: simplify MSVC endianness detection
2020-11-18Merge branch 'jk/format-patch-output'Junio C Hamano2-15/+55
"git format-patch --output=there" did not work as expected and instead crashed. The option is now supported. * jk/format-patch-output: format-patch: support --output option format-patch: tie file-opening logic to output_directory format-patch: refactor output selection
2020-11-18Merge branch 'jc/line-log-takes-no-pathspec'Junio C Hamano2-0/+25
"git log -L<range>:<path>" is documented to take no pathspec, but this was not enforced by the command line option parser, which has been corrected. * jc/line-log-takes-no-pathspec: log: diagnose -L used with pathspec as an error
2020-11-18Merge branch 'rs/empty-reflog-check-fix'Junio C Hamano1-14/+13
The code to see if "git stash drop" can safely remove refs/stash has been made more carerful. * rs/empty-reflog-check-fix: stash: simplify reflog emptiness check
2020-11-18Merge branch 'nk/perf-fsmonitor'Junio C Hamano1-31/+63
Add t/perf support for fsmonitor. * nk/perf-fsmonitor: t/perf/fsmonitor: add benchmark for dirty status t/perf/fsmonitor: perf comparison of multiple fsmonitor integrations t/perf/fsmonitor: initialize test with git reset t/perf/fsmonitor: factor setup for fsmonitor into function t/perf/fsmonitor: silence initial git commit t/perf/fsmonitor: shorten DESC to basename t/perf/fsmonitor: factor description out for readability t/perf/fsmonitor: improve error message if typoing hook name t/perf/fsmonitor: move watchman setup to one-time-repo-setup t/perf/fsmonitor: separate one time repo initialization
2020-11-18Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'Junio C Hamano13-364/+785
Preparation for a new merge strategy. * en/merge-tests: t6423: add more details about direct resolution of directories t6423: note improved ort handling with untracked files t6423, t6436: note improved ort handling with dirty files merge tests: expect slight differences in output for recursive vs. ort t6423: expect improved conflict markers labels in the ort backend t6404, t6423: expect improved rename/delete handling in ort backend t6416: correct expectation for rename/rename(1to2) + directory/file merge tests: expect improved directory/file conflict handling in ort t/: new helper for tests that pass with ort but fail with recursive
2020-11-18Merge branch 'js/default-branch-name-adjust-t5515'Junio C Hamano128-305/+308
Prepare a test script to transition of the default branch name to 'main'. * js/default-branch-name-adjust-t5515: t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (conclusion) t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (part 3) t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (part 2) t5515: use `main` as the name of the main branch for testing (part 1)
2020-11-18Merge branch 'dd/upload-pack-stateless-eof'Junio C Hamano2-1/+29
"git fetch --depth=<n>" over the stateless RPC / smart HTTP transport handled EOF from the client poorly at the server end. * dd/upload-pack-stateless-eof: upload-pack: allow stateless client EOF just prior to haves
2020-11-18t3040: remove stale noteJohannes Schindelin1-3/+0
This comment was most likely a "note to self" during the development of 1c3e5c4ebc3 (Tests for core subproject support, 2007-04-19) and is neither needed nor comprehensible at this point. Let's remove it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18tests: fix description of 'test_set_prereq'SZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
'test_set_prereq's description claims that prereqs can be specified to 'test_expect_code', but that is not the case (it is not meant to run a test _case_, but a git command), so remove it. OTOH that description doesn't mention 'test_external' and 'test_external_without_stderr' that do accept prereqs, so mention them. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18tests: make sure nested lazy prereqs work reliablySZEDER Gábor2-3/+24
Some test prereqs depend on other prereqs, so in a couple of cases we have nested prereqs that look something like this: test_lazy_prereq FOO ' test_have_prereq BAR && check-foo ' This can be problematic, because lazy prereqs are evaluated in the '$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir' directory, which is the same for every prereq, and which is automatically removed after the prereq has been evaluated. So if the inner prereq (BAR above) is a lazy prereq that hasn't been evaluated yet, then after its evaluation the 'prereq-test-dir' shared with the outer prereq will be removed. Consequently, 'check-foo' will find itself in a non-existing directory, and won't be able to create/access any files in its cwd, which could result in an unfulfilled outer prereq. Luckily, this doesn't affect any of our current nested prereqs, either because the inner prereq is not a lazy prereq (e.g. MINGW, CYGWIN or PERL), or because the outer prereq happens to be checked without touching any paths in its cwd (GPGSM and RFC1991 in 'lib-gpg.sh'). So to prevent nested prereqs from interfering with each other let's evaluate each prereq in its own dedicated directory by appending the prereq's name to the directory name, e.g. 'prereq-test-dir-SYMLINKS'. In the test we check not only that the prereq test dir is still there, but also that the inner prereq can't mess with the outer prereq's files. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18t2106: ensure that the checkout fails for the expected reasonJohannes Schindelin1-1/+2
During the transition of the test suite to a new default branch name, it was noticed that this test case succeeded for the wrong reason when the default branch name was overridden. While we fixed that in the previous commit, let's make sure that we look for a tell-tale in the error message that the `git checkout` failed for the reason we wanted it to fail. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18t2106: make test independent of the current main branch nameJohannes Schindelin1-1/+1
We do have this wonderful shortcut `git checkout -` to go back to the previous branch, thanks to the reflog. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18t2106: adjust style to the current conventionsJohannes Schindelin1-14/+16
We settled on the style where the test cases' code starts by the opening single quote being on the `test_expect_*` line, and the closing quote being in its own line after the code. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-17builtin/repack.c: don't move existing packs out of the wayTaylor Blau1-89/+14
When 'git repack' creates a pack with the same name as any existing pack, it moves the existing one to 'old-pack-xxx.{pack,idx,...}' and then renames the new one into place. Eventually, it would be nice to have 'git repack' allow for writing a multi-pack index at the critical time (after the new packs have been written / moved into place, but before the old ones have been deleted). Guessing that this option might be called '--write-midx', this makes the following situation (where repacks are issued back-to-back without any new objects) impossible: $ git repack -adb $ git repack -adb --write-midx In the second repack, the existing packs are overwritten verbatim with the same rename-to-old sequence. At that point, the current MIDX is invalidated, since it refers to now-missing packs. So that code wants to be run after the MIDX is re-written. But (prior to this patch) the new MIDX can't be written until the new packs are moved into place. So, we have a circular dependency. This is all hypothetical, since no code currently exists to write a MIDX safely during a 'git repack' (the 'GIT_TEST_MULTI_PACK_INDEX' does so unsafely). Putting hypothetical aside, though: why do we need to rename existing packs to be prefixed with 'old-' anyway? This behavior dates all the way back to 2ad47d6 (git-repack: Be careful when updating the same pack as an existing one., 2006-06-25). 2ad47d6 is mainly concerned about a case where a newly written pack would have a different structure than its index. This used to be possible when the pack name was a hash of the set of objects. Under this naming scheme, two packs that store the same set of objects could differ in delta selection, object positioning, or both. If this happened, then any such packs would be unreadable in the instant between copying the new pack and new index (i.e., either the index or pack will be stale depending on the order that they were copied). But since 1190a1a (pack-objects: name pack files after trailer hash, 2013-12-05), this is no longer possible, since pack files are named not after their logical contents (i.e., the set of objects), but by the actual checksum of their contents. So, this old- behavior can safely go, which allows us to avoid our circular dependency above. In addition to avoiding the circular dependency, this patch also makes 'git repack' a lot simpler, since we don't have to deal with failures encountered when renaming existing packs to be prefixed with 'old-'. This patch is mostly limited to removing code paths that deal with the 'old' prefixing, with the exception of files that include the pack's name in their own filename, like .idx, .bitmap, and related files. The exception is that we want to continue to trust what pack-objects wrote. That is, it is not the case that we pretend as if pack-objects didn't write files identical to ones that already exist, but rather that we respect what pack-objects wrote as the source of truth. That cuts two ways: - If pack-objects produced an identical pack to one that already exists with a bitmap, but did not produce a bitmap, we remove the bitmap that already exists. (This behavior is codified in t7700.14). - If pack-objects produced an identical pack to one that already exists, we trust the just-written version of the coresponding .idx, .promisor, and other files over the ones that already exist. This ensures that we use the most up-to-date versions of this files, which is safe even in the face of format changes in, say, the .idx file (which would not be reflected in the .idx file's name). Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-17ci: avoid `set-env` construct in print-test-failures.shJunio C Hamano1-1/+1
Imitating cac42e47 (ci: avoid using the deprecated `set-env` construct, 2020-11-07), avoid deprecated ::set-env and use the recommended alternative instead in print-test-failures.sh Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-17completion: bash: improve alias loop detectionFelipe Contreras1-4/+5
It is possible for the name of an alias to end with the name of another alias, in which case the code will incorrectly detect a loop. We can fix that by adding an extra space between words. Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16pull: check for local submodule modifications with the right rangePhilippe Blain2-1/+30
Ever since 'git pull' learned '--recurse-submodules' in a6d7eb2c7a (pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only), 2017-06-23), we check if there are local submodule modifications by checking the revision range 'curr_head --not rebase_fork_point'. The goal of this check is to abort the pull if there are submodule modifications in the local commits being rebased, since this scenario is not supported. However, the actual range of commits being rebased is not 'rebase_fork_point..curr_head', as the logic in 'get_rebase_newbase_and_upstream' reveals, it is 'upstream..curr_head'. If the 'git merge-base --fork-point' invocation in 'get_rebase_fork_point' fails to find a fork point between the current branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling from, 'rebase_fork_point' is null and since 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass null OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), 'submodule_touches_in_range' checks 'curr_head' and all its ancestors for submodule modifications. Since it is highly likely that there are submodule modifications in this range (which is in effect the whole history of the current branch), this prevents 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules' from succeeding if no fork point exists between the current branch and the remote-tracking branch being pulled. This can happen, for example, when the current branch was forked from a commit which was never recorded in the reflog of the remote-tracking branch we are pulling, as the last two paragraphs of the "Discussion on fork-point mode" section in git-merge-base(1) explain. Fix this bug by passing 'upstream' instead of 'rebase_fork_point' as the 'excl_oid' argument to 'submodule_touches_in_range'. Reported-by: Brice Goglin <bgoglin@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16t5572: describe '--rebase' tests a little morePhilippe Blain1-2/+10
It can be hard at first glance to distinguish what is different between the two tests 'recursive rebasing pull' and 'pull rebase recursing fails with conflicts' in 't5572-pull-submodule.sh', and to understand how they relate to the scenarios described in a6d7eb2c7a (pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only), 2017-06-23), which implemented '--recurse-submodules' for 'git pull' and added these tests. Rename the tests to be more descriptive and add some bullet points comments describing the different scenarios. Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16t5572: add notes on a peculiar testPhilippe Blain1-0/+15
Test 5572.63 ("branch has no merge base with remote-tracking counterpart") was introduced in 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass null OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), as a regression test for the bug this commit was fixing (preventing a 'fatal: bad object' error when the current branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling have no merge-base). However, the commit message for 4d36f88be7 does not describe in which real-life situation this bug was encountered. The brief discussion on the mailing list [1] does not either. The regression test is not really representative of a real-life scenario: both the local repository and its upstream have only a single commit, and the "no merge-base" scenario is simulated by recreating this root commit in the local repository using 'git commit-tree' before calling 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules'. The rebase succeeds and results in the local branch being reset to the same root commit as the upstream branch. The fix in 4d36f88be7 modifies 'submodule.c::submodule_touches_in_range' so that if 'excl_oid' is null, which is the case when the 'git merge-base --fork-point' invocation in 'builtin/pull.c::get_rebase_fork_point' errors (no fork-point), then instead of 'incl_oid --not excl_oid' being passed to setup_revisions, only 'incl_oid' is passed, and 'submodule_touches_in_range' examines 'incl_oid' and all its ancestors to verify that they do not touch the submodule. In test 5572.63, the recreated lone root commit in the local repository is thus the only commit being examined by 'submodule_touches_in_range', and this commit *adds* the submodule. However, 'submodule_touches_in_range' *succeeds* because 'combine-diff.c::diff_tree_combined' (see the backtrace below) returns early since this commit is the root commit and has no parents. #0 diff_tree_combined at combine-diff.c:1494 #1 0x0000000100150cbe in diff_tree_combined_merge at combine-diff.c:1649 #2 0x00000001002c7147 in collect_changed_submodules at submodule.c:869 #3 0x00000001002c7d6f in submodule_touches_in_range at submodule.c:1268 #4 0x00000001000ad58b in cmd_pull at builtin/pull.c:1040 In light of all this, add a note in t5572 documenting this peculiar test. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180524204729.19896-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/t/#u Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16pull --rebase: compute rebase arguments in separate functionPhilippe Blain1-11/+35
The function 'run_rebase' is responsible for constructing the command line to be passed to 'git rebase'. This includes both forwarding pass-through options given to 'git pull' as well computing the <newbase> and <upstream> arguments to 'git rebase'. A following commit will need to access the <upstream> argument in 'cmd_pull' to fix a bug with 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules'. In order to do so, refactor the code so that the <newbase> and <upstream> commits are computed in a new, separate function, 'get_rebase_newbase_and_upstream'. Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16add -i: verify in the tests that colors can be overriddenJohannes Schindelin1-0/+84
Now that the Perl version produces the same output as the built-in version (mostly fixing bugs in the latter), let's add a regression test to verify that it stays this way. Note that we only `grep` for the colored error message instead of verifying that the entire `stderr` consists of just this one line: when running the test script using the `-x` option to trace the commands, the sub-shell in `force_color` causes those commands to be traced into `err.raw` (unless running in Bash where we set the `BASH_XTRACEFD` variable to avoid that). Also note that the color reset in the `<BLUE>+<RESET><BLUE>new<RESET>` line might look funny and unnecessary, as the corresponding `old` line does not reset the color after the diff marker only to turn the color back on right away. However, this is a (necessary) side effect of the white-space check: in `emit_line_ws_markup()`, we first emit the diff marker via `emit_line_0()` and then the rest of the line via `ws_check_emit()`. To leave them somewhat decoupled, the color has to be reset after the diff marker to allow for the rest of the line to start with another color (or inverted, in case of white-space issues). Finally, we have to simulate hunk editing: the `git add -p` command cannot rely on the internal diff machinery for coloring after letting the user edit a hunk; It has to "re-color" the edited hunk. This is the primary reason why that command is interested in the exact values of the `color.diff.*` settings in the first place. To test this re-coloring, we therefore have to pretend to edit a hunk and then show that hunk in the regression test. Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16add -p: prefer color.diff.context over color.diff.plainJohannes Schindelin2-5/+7
Git's diff machinery allows users to override the colors to use in diffs, even the plain-colored context lines. As of 8dbf3eb6850 (diff.h: rename DIFF_PLAIN color slot to DIFF_CONTEXT, 2015-05-27), the preferred name of the config setting is `color.diff.context`, although Git still allows `color.diff.plain`. In the context of `git add -p`, this logic is a bit hard to replicate: `git_diff_basic_config()` reads all config values sequentially and if it sees _any_ `color.diff.context` or `color.diff.plain`, it accepts the new color. The Perl version of `git add -p` needs to go through `git config --get-color`, though, which allows only one key to be specified. The same goes for the built-in version of `git add -p`, which has to go through `repo_config_get_value()`. The best we can do here is to look for `.context` and if none is found, fall back to looking for `.plain`, and if still not found, fall back to the hard-coded default (which in this case is simply the empty string, as context lines are typically rendered without colored). This still leads to inconsistencies when both config names are used: the initial diff will be colored by the diff machinery. Once edited by a user, a hunk has to be re-colored by `git add -p`, though, which would then use the other setting to color the context lines. In practice, this is not _all_ that bad. The `git config` manual says this in the `color.diff.<slot>`: `context` (context text - `plain` is a historical synonym) We should therefore assume that users use either one or the other, but not both names. Besides, it is relatively uncommon to look at a hunk after editing it because it is immediately staged by default. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16add -i (Perl version): color header to match the C versionJohannes Schindelin1-4/+2
Both versions of `add -i` indent non-flat lists by five spaces. However when using color the C version prints these spaces after the ANSI color codes whereas the Perl version prints them before the color codes. Change the Perl version to match the C version to allow for introducing a test that verifies that both versions produce the exact same output. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16add -i (built-in): use the same indentation as the Perl versionJohannes Schindelin1-1/+1
When copying the spaces used to indent non-flat lists in `git add -i`, one space was appended by mistake. This makes the output of the built-in version of `git add -i` inconsistent with the Perl version. Let's adjust the built-in version to produce the same output as the Perl version. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16add -p (built-in): do not color the progress indicator separatelyJohannes Schindelin1-5/+5
The Perl version of this command colors the progress indicator and the prompt message in one go. Let's do the same in the built-in version so that the same upcoming test (which will compare the output of `git add -p` against a known-good version) will pass both for the Perl version as well as for the built-in version. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16builtin/repack.c: keep track of what pack-objects wroteTaylor Blau1-1/+30
In the subsequent commit, it will become useful to keep track of which metadata files were written by pack-objects. We already do this to an extent with the 'exts' array, which only is used in the context of existing packs. Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16repack: make "exts" array available outside cmd_repack()Jeff King1-9/+10
We'll use it in a helper function soon. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-16list-objects-filter-options: fix function name in BUGMartin Ågren1-1/+1
Fix the function name we give in the BUG message. It's "config", not "choice". Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>