| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"date_mode" in the "struct ref_info".
This uses the date_mode_release() function added in 974c919d36d (date
API: add and use a date_mode_release(), 2022-02-16). As that commit
notes "t7004-tag.sh" tests for the leaks that are being fixed
here. That test now fails "only" 44 tests, instead of the 46 it failed
before this change.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Call diff_free() on the "pruning" member of "struct rev_info". Doing
so makes several tests pass under SANITIZE=leak.
This was also the last missing piece that allows us to remove the
UNLEAK() in "cmd_diff" and "cmd_diff_index", which allows us to use
those commands as a canary for general leaks in the revisions API. See
[1] for further rationale, and 886e1084d78 (builtin/: add UNLEAKs,
2017-10-01) for the commit that added the UNLEAK() there.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220218.861r00ib86.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a missing reflog_walk_info_release() to "reflog-walk.c" and use it
in release_revisions().
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Clear the "boundary_commits" object_array in release_revisions(). This
makes a few more tests pass under SANITIZE=leak, including
"t/t4126-apply-empty.sh" which started failed as an UNLEAK() in
cmd_format_patch() was removed in a preceding commit.
This also re-marks the various tests relying on "git format-patch" as
passing under "SANITIZE=leak", in the preceding "revisions API users:
use release_revisions() in builtin/log.c" commit those were marked as
failing as we removed the UNLEAK(rev) from cmd_format_patch() in
"builtin/log.c".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"prune_data" in the "struct rev_info". This means that any code that
calls "release_revisions()" already can get rid of adjacent calls to
clear_pathspec().
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"grep_filter" in the "struct rev_info".This allows us to mark a test
as passing under "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"filter" in the "struct rev_info". This in combination with a
preceding change to free "cmdline" means that we can mark another set
of tests as passing under "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
The "filter" member was added recently in ffaa137f646 (revision: put
object filter into struct rev_info, 2022-03-09), and this fixes leaks
intruded in the subsequent leak 7940941de1f (pack-objects: use
rev.filter when possible, 2022-03-09) and 105c6f14ad3 (bundle: parse
filter capability, 2022-03-09).
The "builtin/pack-objects.c" leak in 7940941de1f was effectively with
us already, but the variable was referred to by a "static" file-scoped
variable. The "bundle.c " leak in 105c6f14ad3 was newly introduced
with the new "filter" feature for bundles.
The "t5600-clone-fail-cleanup.sh" change here to add
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" is one of the cases where
run-command.c in not carrying the abort() exit code upwards would have
had that test passing before, but now it *actually* passes[1]. We
should fix the lack of 1=1 mapping of SANITIZE=leak testing to actual
leaks some other time, but it's an existing edge case, let's just mark
the really-passing test as passing for now.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220303.86fsnz5o9w.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"cmdline" in the "struct rev_info". This in combination with a
preceding change to free "commits" and "mailmap" means that we can
whitelist another test under "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
There was a proposal in [1] to do away with xstrdup()-ing this
add_rev_cmdline(), perhaps that would be worthwhile, but for now let's
just free() it.
We could also make that a "char *" in "struct rev_cmdline_entry"
itself, but since we own it let's expose it as a constant to outside
callers. I proposed that in [2] but have since changed my mind. See
14d30cdfc04 (ref-filter: fix memory leak in `free_array_item()`,
2019-07-10), c514c62a4fd (checkout: fix leak of non-existent branch
names, 2020-08-14) and other log history hits for "free((char *)" for
prior art.
This includes the tests we had false-positive passes on before my
6798b08e848 (perl Git.pm: don't ignore signalled failure in
_cmd_close(), 2022-02-01), now they pass for real.
Since there are 66 tests matching t/t[0-9]*git-svn*.sh it's easier to
list those that don't pass than to touch most of those 66. So let's
introduce a "TEST_FAILS_SANITIZE_LEAK=true", which if set in the tests
won't cause lib-git-svn.sh to set "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true.
This change also marks all the tests that we removed
"TEST_FAILS_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" from in an earlier commit due to
removing the UNLEAK() from cmd_format_patch(), we can now assert that
its API use doesn't leak any "struct rev_info" memory.
This change also made commit "t5503-tagfollow.sh" pass on current
master, but that would regress when combined with
ps/fetch-atomic-fixup's de004e848a9 (t5503: simplify setup of test
which exercises failure of backfill, 2022-03-03) (through no fault of
that topic, that change started using "git clone" in the test, which
has an outstanding leak). Let's leave that test out for now to avoid
in-flight semantic conflicts.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YUj%2FgFRh6pwrZalY@carlos-mbp.lan/
2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87o88obkb1.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"mailmap" in the "struct rev_info".
The log family of functions now calls the clear_mailmap() function
added in fa8afd18e5a (revisions API: provide and use a
release_revisions(), 2021-09-19), allowing us to whitelist some tests
with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Unfortunately having a pointer to a mailmap in "struct rev_info"
instead of an embedded member that we "own" get a bit messy, as can be
seen in the change to builtin/commit.c.
When we free() this data we won't be able to tell apart a pointer to a
"mailmap" on the heap from one on the stack. As seen in
ea57bc0d41b (log: add --use-mailmap option, 2013-01-05) the "log"
family allocates it on the heap, but in the find_author_by_nickname()
code added in ea16794e430 (commit: search author pattern against
mailmap, 2013-08-23) we allocated it on the stack instead.
Ideally we'd simply change that member to a "struct string_list
mailmap" and never free() the "mailmap" itself, but that would be a
much larger change to the revisions API.
We have code that needs to hand an existing "mailmap" to a "struct
rev_info", while we could change all of that, let's not go there
now.
The complexity isn't in the ownership of the "mailmap" per-se, but
that various things assume a "rev_info.mailmap == NULL" means "doesn't
want mailmap", if we changed that to an init'd "struct string_list
we'd need to carefully refactor things to change those assumptions.
Let's instead always free() it, and simply declare that if you add
such a "mailmap" it must be allocated on the heap. Any modern libc
will correctly panic if we free() a stack variable, so this should be
safe going forward.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Extend the the release_revisions() function so that it frees the
"commits" in the "struct rev_info".
We don't expect to use this "struct rev_info" again, so there's no
reason to NULL out revs->commits, as e.g. simplify_merges() and
create_boundary_commit_list() do.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Use release_revisions() for users of "struct rev_list" that reach into
the "struct rev_info" and clear the "prune_data" already.
In a subsequent commit we'll teach release_revisions() to clear this
itself, but in the meantime let's invoke release_revisions() here to
clear anything else we may have missed, and for reasons of having
consistent boilerplate.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Use a release_revisions() with those "struct rev_list" users which
already "UNLEAK" the struct. It may seem odd to simultaneously attempt
to free() memory, but also to explicitly ignore whether we have memory
leaks in the same.
As explained in preceding commits this is being done to use the
built-in commands as a guinea pig for whether the release_revisions()
function works as expected, we'd like to test e.g. whether we segfault
as we change it. In subsequent commits we'll then remove these
UNLEAK() as the function is made to free the memory that caused us to
add them in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In preparation for having the "log" family of functions make wider use
of release_revisions() let's have them call it just before
exiting. This changes the "log", "whatchanged", "show",
"format-patch", etc. commands, all of which live in this file.
The release_revisions() API still only frees the "pending" member, but
will learn to release more members of "struct rev_info" in subsequent
commits.
In the case of "format-patch" revert the addition of UNLEAK() in
dee839a2633 (format-patch: mark rev_info with UNLEAK, 2021-12-16),
which will cause several tests that previously passed under
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to start failing.
In subsequent commits we'll now be able to use those tests to check
whether that part of the API is really leaking memory, and will fix
all of those memory leaks. Removing the UNLEAK() allows us to make
incremental progress in that direction. See [1] for further details
about this approach.
Note that the release_revisions() will not be sufficient to deal with
the code in cmd_show() added in 5d7eeee2ac6 (git-show: grok blobs,
trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14) which clobbers the "pending" array in
the case of "OBJ_COMMIT". That will need to be dealt with by some
future follow-up work.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220218.861r00ib86.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In the case of cmd_main() in http-push.c we need to move the
deceleration of the "struct rev-list" into the loop over the
"remote_refs" when adding a release_revisions().
We'd previously set up the "revs" for each remote, but would
potentially leak memory on each one.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a release_revisions() to various users of "struct rev_info" which
requires a minor refactoring to a "goto cleanup" pattern to use that
function.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Change the initialization of the "revision" member of "struct
stash_info" to be initialized vi a macro, and more importantly that
that initializing function be tasked to free it, usually via a "goto
cleanup" pattern.
Despite the "revision" name (and the topic of the series containing
this commit) the "stash info" has nothing to do with the "struct
rev_info". I'm making this change because in the subsequent commit
when we do want to free the "struct rev_info" via a "goto cleanup"
pattern we'd otherwise free() uninitialized memory in some cases, as
we only strbuf_init() the string in get_stash_info().
So while it's not the smallest possible change, let's convert all
users of this pattern in the file while we're at it.
A good follow-up to this change would be to change all the "ret = -1;
goto done;" in this file to instead use a "goto cleanup", and
initialize "int ret = -1" at the start of the relevant functions. That
would allow us to drop a lot of needless brace verbosity on two-line
"if" statements, but let's leave that alone for now.
To ensure that there's a 1=1 mapping between owners of the "struct
stash_info" and free_stash_info() change the assert_stash_ref()
function to be a trivial get_stash_info_assert() wrapper. The caller
will call free_stash_info(), and by returning -1 we'll eventually (via
!!ret) exit with status 1 anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Use release_revisions() to various users of "struct rev_list" which
need to have their "struct rev_info" zero-initialized before we can
start using it.
For the bundle.c code see the early exit case added in
3bbbe467f29 (bundle verify: error out if called without an object
database, 2019-05-27).
For the relevant bisect.c code see 45b6370812c (bisect: libify
`check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad` and its dependents, 2020-02-17).
For the submodule.c code see the "goto" on "(!left || !right || !sub)"
added in 8e6df65015f (submodule: refactor show_submodule_summary with
helper function, 2016-08-31).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A subsequent commit will add "REV_INFO_INIT" macro adjacent to
repo_init_revisions(), unfortunately between the "struct rev_info"
itself and that function we've added various miscellaneous code
between the two over the years.
Let's move that code either lower in revision.h, giving it API docs
while we're at it, or in cases where it wasn't public API at all move
it into revision.c No lines of code are changed here, only moved
around. The only changes are the addition of new API comments.
The "tree_difference" variable could also be declared like this, which
I think would be a lot clearer, but let's leave that for now to keep
this a move-only change:
static enum {
REV_TREE_SAME,
REV_TREE_NEW, /* Only new files */
REV_TREE_OLD, /* Only files removed */
REV_TREE_DIFFERENT, /* Mixed changes */
} tree_difference = REV_TREE_SAME;
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a release_revisions() to various users of "struct rev_list" in
those straightforward cases where we only need to add the
release_revisions() call to the end of a block, and don't need to
e.g. refactor anything to use a "goto cleanup" pattern.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The users of the revision.[ch] API's "struct rev_info" are a major
source of memory leaks in the test suite under SANITIZE=leak, which in
turn adds a lot of noise when trying to mark up tests with
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
The users of that API are largely one-shot, e.g. "git rev-list" or
"git log", or the "git checkout" and "git stash" being modified here
For these callers freeing the memory is arguably a waste of time, but
in many cases they've actually been trying to free the memory, and
just doing that in a buggy manner.
Let's provide a release_revisions() function for these users, and
start migrating them over per the plan outlined in [1]. Right now this
only handles the "pending" member of the struct, but more will be
added in subsequent commits.
Even though we only clear the "pending" member now, let's not leave a
trap in code like the pre-image of index_differs_from(), where we'd
start doing the wrong thing as soon as the release_revisions() learned
to clear its "diffopt". I.e. we need to call release_revisions() after
we've inspected any state in "struct rev_info".
This leaves in place e.g. clear_pathspec(&rev.prune_data) in
stash_working_tree() in builtin/stash.c, subsequent commits will teach
release_revisions() to free "prune_data" and other members that in
some cases are individually cleared by users of "struct rev_info" by
reaching into its members. Those subsequent commits will remove the
relevant calls to e.g. clear_pathspec().
We avoid amending code in index_differs_from() in diff-lib.c as well
as wt_status_collect_changes_index(), has_unstaged_changes() and
has_uncommitted_changes() in wt-status.c in a way that assumes that we
are already clearing the "diffopt" member. That will be handled in a
subsequent commit.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a6k8daeu.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add and apply coccinelle rules to remove "if (E)" before
"free_commit_list(E)", the function can accept NULL, and further
change cases where "E = NULL" followed to also be unconditionally.
The code changes in this commit were entirely made by the coccinelle
rule being added here, and applied with:
make contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch
patch -p1 <contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch
The only manual intervention here is that the the relevant code in
commit.c has been manually re-indented.
Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix two memory leaks in "struct rev_info" by freeing that memory in
cmd_format_patch(). These two are unusual special-cases in being in
the "struct rev_info", but not being "owned" by the code in
revision.c. I.e. they're members of the struct so that this code in
"builtin/log.c" can conveniently pass information code in
"log-tree.c".
See e.g. the make_cover_letter() caller of log_write_email_headers()
here in "builtin/log.c", and [1] for a demonstration of where the
"extra_headers" and "ref_message_ids" struct members are used.
See 20ff06805c6 (format-patch: resurrect extra headers from config,
2006-06-02) and d1566f7883f (git-format-patch: Make the second and
subsequent mails replies to the first, 2006-07-14) for the initial
introduction of "extra_headers" and "ref_message_ids".
We can count on repo_init_revisions() memset()-ing this data to 0
however, so we can count on it being either NULL or something we
allocated. In the case of "extra_headers" let's add a local "char *"
variable to hold it, to avoid the eventual cast from "const char *"
when we free() it.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220401.868rsoogxf.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Follow-up on the introduction of string_list_init_nodup() and
string_list_init_dup() in the series merged in bd4232fac33 (Merge
branch 'ab/struct-init', 2021-07-16) and convert code that implicitly
relied on xcalloc() being equivalent to the initializer to use
xmalloc() and string_list_init_{no,}dup() instead.
In the case of get_unmerged() in merge-recursive.c we used the
combination of xcalloc() and assigning "1" to "strdup_strings" to get
what we'd get via string_list_init_dup(), let's use that instead.
Adjacent code in cmd_format_patch() will be changed in a subsequent
commit, since we're changing that let's change the other in-tree
patterns that do the same. Let's also convert a "x == NULL" to "!x"
per our CodingGuidelines, as we need to change the "if" line anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Amend a freeing pattern added in 0906ac2b54b (blame: use changed-path
Bloom filters, 2020-04-16) to use a "goto cleanup", so that we can be
sure that we call cleanup_scoreboard().
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fix a memory leak that's been with us since f9500261e0a (fast-rebase:
write conflict state to working tree, index, and HEAD, 2021-05-20)
changed this code to move these strbuf_release() into an if/else
block.
We'll also add to "reflog_msg" in the "else" arm of the "if" block
being modified here, and we'll append to "branch_msg" in both
cases. But after f9500261e0a only the "if" block would free these two
"struct strbuf".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Directly invoking make coverage-report as a target results in an error because
its prerequisites are missing,
This patch adds the compile-test prerequisite, which is run only once each time
the compile-report target is invoked. In practice, the developer may decide to
review the coverage-report results without necessarily rerunning for this
coverage-test, if it has already been run.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
* 'loc/tw/0407' of github.com:l10n-tw/git-po:
l10n: zh_TW: v2.36.0 round 2
|
|
Signed-off-by: Yi-Jyun Pan <pan93412@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Helped-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We do not have to guess how common the mistake the change targets is
when describing it. Such an argument may be good while proposing a
change, but does not quite belong in the record of what has already
happened, i.e. a release note.
Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 2a0cafd464709cfa22fe7249290c644a2a26c520,
as it expects a working "a ref deletion must produce a single
transaction, not one for loose and another for packed" topic,
which we do not have.
|
|
This reverts commit 991b4d47f0accd3955d05927d5ce434e03ffbdb6, reversing
changes made to bcd020f88e1e22f38422ac3f73ab06b34ec4bef1.
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
With the addition of the safe.directory in 8959555ce
(setup_git_directory(): add an owner check for the top-level directory,
2022-03-02) released in v2.35.2, we are receiving feedback from a
variety of users about the feature.
Some users have a very large list of shared repositories and find it
cumbersome to add this config for every one of them.
In a more difficult case, certain workflows involve running Git commands
within containers. The container boundary prevents any global or system
config from communicating `safe.directory` values from the host into the
container. Further, the container almost always runs as a different user
than the owner of the directory in the host.
To simplify the reactions necessary for these users, extend the
definition of the safe.directory config value to include a possible '*'
value. This value implies that all directories are safe, providing a
single setting to opt-out of this protection.
Note that an empty assignment of safe.directory clears all previous
values, and this is already the case with the "if (!value || !*value)"
condition.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It seems that nothing is ever checking to make sure the safe directories
in the configs actually have the key safe.directory, so some unrelated
config that has a value with a certain directory would also make it a
safe directory.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Valadares <me@m28.io>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It is difficult to change the ownership on a directory in our test
suite, so insert a new GIT_TEST_ASSUME_DIFFERENT_OWNER environment
variable to trick Git into thinking we are in a differently-owned
directory. This allows us to test that the config is parsed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Emir SARI <emir_sari@icloud.com>
|
|
Generate po/git.pot from v2.36.0-rc2 for git v2.36.0 l10n round 2.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
|
|
* 'master' of github.com:git/git: (25 commits)
Git 2.36-rc2
i18n: fix some badly formatted i18n strings
Git 2.36-rc1
t9902: split test to run on appropriate systems
ls-tree doc: document interaction with submodules
Documentation: add --batch-command to cat-file synopsis
git-ls-tree.txt: fix the name of "%(objectsize:padded)"
submodule-helper: fix usage string
doc: replace "--" with {litdd} in credential-cache/fsmonitor
contrib/scalar: fix 'all' target in Makefile
Documentation/Makefile: fix "make info" regression in dad9cd7d518
configure.ac: fix HAVE_SYNC_FILE_RANGE definition
git-compat-util: really support openssl as a source of entropy
ls-tree: `-l` should not imply recursive listing
Git 2.35.2
Git 2.34.2
Git 2.33.2
Git 2.32.1
Git 2.31.2
Git 2.30.3
...
|
|
Use test_path_is_file() instead of 'test -f' for better debugging
information.
Signed-off-by: Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Fixes to some localizable strings.
* ja/i18n-fix-for-2.36:
i18n: fix some badly formatted i18n strings
|
