summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-11-18parse_object(): drop extra "has" check before checking object typeJeff King1-2/+1
When parsing an object of unknown type, we check to see if it's a blob, so we can use our streaming code path. This uses oid_object_info() to check the type, but before doing so we call repo_has_object_file(). This latter is pointless, as oid_object_info() will already fail if the object is missing. Checking it ahead of time just complicates the code and is a waste of resources (albeit small). Let's drop the redundant check. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17branch: force-copy a branch to itself via @{-1} is a no-opRubén Justo2-3/+13
Since 52d59cc645 (branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move (-m), 2017-06-18) we can copy a branch to make a new branch with the '-c' (copy) option or to overwrite an existing branch using the '-C' (force copy) option. A no-op possibility is considered when we are asked to copy a branch to itself, to follow the same no-op introduced for the rename (-M) operation in 3f59481e33 (branch: allow a no-op "branch -M <current-branch> HEAD", 2011-11-25). To check for this, in 52d59cc645 we compared the branch names provided by the user, source (HEAD if omitted) and destination, and a match is considered as this no-op. Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout: implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th last branch, 2009-01-17) a branch can be specified using shortcuts like @{-1}. This allows this usage: $ git checkout -b test $ git checkout - $ git branch -C test test # no-op $ git branch -C test @{-1} # oops $ git branch -C @{-1} test # oops As we are using the branch name provided by the user to do the comparison, if one of the branches is provided using a shortcut we are not going to have a match and a call to git_config_copy_section() will happen. This will make a duplicate of the configuration for that branch, and with this progression the second call will produce four copies of the configuration, and so on. Let's use the interpreted branch name instead for this comparison. The rename operation is not affected. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17receive-pack: only use visible refs for connectivity checkPatrick Steinhardt3-0/+12
When serving a push, git-receive-pack(1) needs to verify that the packfile sent by the client contains all objects that are required by the updated references. This connectivity check works by marking all preexisting references as uninteresting and using the new reference tips as starting point for a graph walk. Marking all preexisting references as uninteresting can be a problem when it comes to performance. Git forges tend to do internal bookkeeping to keep alive sets of objects for internal use or make them easy to find via certain references. These references are typically hidden away from the user so that they are neither advertised nor writeable. At GitLab, we have one particular repository that contains a total of 7 million references, of which 6.8 million are indeed internal references. With the current connectivity check we are forced to load all these references in order to mark them as uninteresting, and this alone takes around 15 seconds to compute. We can optimize this by only taking into account the set of visible refs when marking objects as uninteresting. This means that we may now walk more objects until we hit any object that is marked as uninteresting. But it is rather unlikely that clients send objects that make large parts of objects reachable that have previously only ever been hidden, whereas the common case is to push incremental changes that build on top of the visible object graph. This provides a huge boost to performance in the mentioned repository, where the vast majority of its refs hidden. Pushing a new commit into this repo with `transfer.hideRefs` set up to hide 6.8 million of 7 refs as it is configured in Gitaly leads to a 4.5-fold speedup: Benchmark 1: main Time (mean ± σ): 30.977 s ± 0.157 s [User: 30.226 s, System: 1.083 s] Range (min … max): 30.796 s … 31.071 s 3 runs Benchmark 2: pks-connectivity-check-hide-refs Time (mean ± σ): 6.799 s ± 0.063 s [User: 6.803 s, System: 0.354 s] Range (min … max): 6.729 s … 6.850 s 3 runs Summary 'pks-connectivity-check-hide-refs' ran 4.56 ± 0.05 times faster than 'main' As we mostly go through the same codepaths even in the case where there are no hidden refs at all compared to the code before there is no change in performance when no refs are hidden: Benchmark 1: main Time (mean ± σ): 48.188 s ± 0.432 s [User: 49.326 s, System: 5.009 s] Range (min … max): 47.706 s … 48.539 s 3 runs Benchmark 2: pks-connectivity-check-hide-refs Time (mean ± σ): 48.027 s ± 0.500 s [User: 48.934 s, System: 5.025 s] Range (min … max): 47.504 s … 48.500 s 3 runs Summary 'pks-connectivity-check-hide-refs' ran 1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than 'main' Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17rev-parse: add `--exclude-hidden=` optionPatrick Steinhardt3-0/+57
Add a new `--exclude-hidden=` option that is similar to the one we just added to git-rev-list(1). Given a section name `uploadpack` or `receive` as argument, it causes us to exclude all references that would be hidden by the respective `$section.hideRefs` configuration. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17revision: add new parameter to exclude hidden refsPatrick Steinhardt5-1/+241
Users can optionally hide refs from remote users in git-upload-pack(1), git-receive-pack(1) and others via the `transfer.hideRefs`, but there is not an easy way to obtain the list of all visible or hidden refs right now. We'll require just that though for a performance improvement in our connectivity check. Add a new option `--exclude-hidden=` that excludes any hidden refs from the next pseudo-ref like `--all` or `--branches`. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17revision: introduce struct to handle exclusionsPatrick Steinhardt3-36/+47
The functions that handle exclusion of refs work on a single string list. We're about to add a second mechanism for excluding refs though, and it makes sense to reuse much of the same architecture for both kinds of exclusion. Introduce a new `struct ref_exclusions` that encapsulates all the logic related to excluding refs and move the `struct string_list` that holds all wildmatch patterns of excluded refs into it. Rename functions that operate on this struct to match its name. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17revision: move together exclusion-related functionsPatrick Steinhardt1-26/+26
Move together the definitions of functions that handle exclusions of refs so that related functionality sits in a single place, only. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17refs: get rid of global list of hidden refsPatrick Steinhardt5-31/+39
We're about to add a new argument to git-rev-list(1) that allows it to add all references that are visible when taking `transfer.hideRefs` et al into account. This will require us to potentially parse multiple sets of hidden refs, which is not easily possible right now as there is only a single, global instance of the list of parsed hidden refs. Refactor `parse_hide_refs_config()` and `ref_is_hidden()` so that both take the list of hidden references as input and adjust callers to keep a local list, instead. This allows us to easily use multiple hidden-ref lists. Furthermore, it allows us to properly free this list before we exit. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-17refs: fix memory leak when parsing hideRefs configPatrick Steinhardt1-1/+1
When parsing the hideRefs configuration, we first duplicate the config value so that we can modify it. We then subsequently append it to the `hide_refs` string list, which is initialized with `strdup_strings` enabled. As a consequence we again reallocate the string, but never free the first duplicate and thus have a memory leak. While we never clean up the static `hide_refs` variable anyway, this is no excuse to make the leak worse by leaking every value twice. We are also about to change the way this variable will be handled so that we do indeed start to clean it up. So let's fix the memory leak by using the `string_list_append_nodup()` so that we pass ownership of the allocated string to `hide_refs`. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-16notes: avoid empty line in templateMichael J Gruber1-1/+1
When `git notes` prepares the template it adds an empty newline between the comment header and the content: > > # > # Write/edit the notes for the following object: > > # commit 0f3c55d4c2b7864bffb2d92278eff08d0b2e083f > # etc This is wrong structurally because that newline is part of the comment, too, and thus should be commented. Also, it throws off some positioning strategies of editors and plugins, and it differs from how we do commit templates. Change this to follow the standard set by `git commit`: > > # > # Write/edit the notes for the following object: > # > # commit 0f3c55d4c2b7864bffb2d92278eff08d0b2e083f > Tests pass unchanged after this code change. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@grubix.eu> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-15t7610: use "file:///dev/null", not "/dev/null", fixes MinGWÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+2
On MinGW the "/dev/null" is translated to "nul" on command-lines, even though as in this case it'll never end up referring to an actual file. So on Windows the fix for the previous "example.com" timeout issue in 8354cf752ec (t7610: fix flaky timeout issue, don't clone from example.com, 2022-11-05) would yield: fatal: repo URL: 'nul' must be absolute or begin with ./|../ Let's evade this yet again by prefixing this with "file://", which makes this pass in the Windows CI. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-15bisect; remove unused "git-bisect.sh" and ".gitignore" entryÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2-64/+0
Since 73fce29427 (Turn `git bisect` into a full built-in, 2022-11-10) we've used builtin/bisect.c instead of git-bisect.sh to implement the "bisect" command. Let's remove the unused leftover script, and the ".gitignore" entry for the "git-bisect--helper", which also hasn't been built since 73fce29427. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-15builtin/gc.c: fix use-after-free in maintenance_unregister()Taylor Blau1-3/+2
While trying to fix a move based on an uninitialized value (along with a declaration after the first statement), be0fd57228 (maintenance --unregister: fix uninit'd data use & -Wdeclaration-after-statement, 2022-11-15) unintentionally introduced a use-after-free. The problem arises when `maintenance_unregister()` sees a non-NULL `config_file` string and thus tries to call git_configset_get_value_multi() to lookup the corresponding values. We store the result off, and then call git_configset_clear(), which frees the pointer that we just stored. We then try to read that now-freed pointer a few lines below, and there we have our use-after-free: $ ./t7900-maintenance.sh -vxi --run=23 --valgrind [...] + git maintenance unregister --config-file ./other ==3048727== Invalid read of size 8 ==3048727== at 0x1869CA: maintenance_unregister (gc.c:1590) ==3048727== by 0x188F42: cmd_maintenance (gc.c:2651) ==3048727== by 0x128C62: run_builtin (git.c:466) ==3048727== by 0x12907E: handle_builtin (git.c:721) ==3048727== by 0x1292EC: run_argv (git.c:788) ==3048727== by 0x12988E: cmd_main (git.c:926) ==3048727== by 0x21ED39: main (common-main.c:57) ==3048727== Address 0x4b38bc8 is 24 bytes inside a block of size 64 free'd ==3048727== at 0x484617B: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:872) ==3048727== by 0x2D207E: free_individual_entries (hashmap.c:188) ==3048727== by 0x2D2153: hashmap_clear_ (hashmap.c:207) ==3048727== by 0x270B5C: git_configset_clear (config.c:2375) ==3048727== by 0x1869AC: maintenance_unregister (gc.c:1585) ==3048727== by 0x188F42: cmd_maintenance (gc.c:2651) ==3048727== by 0x128C62: run_builtin (git.c:466) ==3048727== by 0x12907E: handle_builtin (git.c:721) ==3048727== by 0x1292EC: run_argv (git.c:788) ==3048727== by 0x12988E: cmd_main (git.c:926) ==3048727== by 0x21ED39: main (common-main.c:57) [...] Resolve this via a partial-revert of be0fd57228. The config_set struct now gets a zero initialization, which makes free()-ing it a noop even without calling git_configset_init(). When we do initialize it to a non-zero value, it is only free()'d after our last read of `list`. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-15maintenance --unregister: fix uninit'd data use & -Wdeclaration-after-statementÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+3
Since (maintenance: add option to register in a specific config, 2022-11-09) we've been unable to build with "DEVELOPER=1" without "DEVOPTS=no-error", as the added code triggers a "-Wdeclaration-after-statement" warning. And worse than that, the data handed to git_configset_clear() is uninitialized, as can be spotted with e.g.: ./t7900-maintenance.sh -vixd --run=23 --valgrind [...] + git maintenance unregister --force Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) at 0x6B5F1E: git_configset_clear (config.c:2367) by 0x4BA64E: maintenance_unregister (gc.c:1619) by 0x4BD278: cmd_maintenance (gc.c:2650) by 0x409905: run_builtin (git.c:466) by 0x40A21C: handle_builtin (git.c:721) by 0x40A58E: run_argv (git.c:788) by 0x40AF68: cmd_main (git.c:926) by 0x5D39FE: main (common-main.c:57) Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation at 0x4BA22C: maintenance_unregister (gc.c:1557) Let's fix both of these issues, and also move the scope of the variable to the "if" statement it's used in, to make it obvious where it's used. Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14maintenance: add option to register in a specific configRonan Pigott3-21/+59
maintenance register currently records the maintenance repo exclusively within the user's global configuration, but other configuration files may be relevant when running maintenance if they are included from the global config. This option allows the user to choose where maintenance repos are recorded. Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@rjp.ie> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14for-each-repo: interpolate repo path argumentsRonan Pigott2-1/+10
This is a quality of life change for git-maintenance, so repos can be recorded with the tilde syntax. The register subcommand will not record repos in this format by default. Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@rjp.ie> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14The twelfth batchTaylor Blau1-0/+11
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14Merge branch 'vh/my-first-contribution-typo'Taylor Blau1-1/+1
Documentation fix. * vh/my-first-contribution-typo: Documentation: fix typo
2022-11-14Merge branch 'ks/partialclone-casing'Taylor Blau1-2/+2
Documentation fix. * ks/partialclone-casing: repository-version.txt: partialClone casing change
2022-11-14Merge branch 'mh/password-can-be-pat'Taylor Blau1-3/+4
Documentation update to git-credential(1). * mh/password-can-be-pat: Documentation/gitcredentials.txt: mention password alternatives
2022-11-14Merge branch 'js/ci-set-output'Taylor Blau1-3/+3
Update the actions/github-script dependency in CI to avoid a deprecation warning. * js/ci-set-output: ci: use a newer `github-script` version
2022-11-14Merge branch 'ab/rev-info-init'Taylor Blau2-18/+19
Progress on being able to initialize a rev_info struct with a macro. * ab/rev-info-init: revisions API: extend the nascent REV_INFO_INIT macro
2022-11-14Merge branch 'al/trace2-clearing-skip-worktree'Taylor Blau1-6/+24
Add trace2 counters to the region to clear skip worktree bits in a sparse checkout. * al/trace2-clearing-skip-worktree: index: raise a bug if the index is materialised more than once index: add trace2 region for clear skip worktree
2022-11-14Merge branch 'do/modernize-t7001'Taylor Blau1-31/+31
Modernize test script to avoid "test -f" and friends. * do/modernize-t7001: t7001-mv.sh: modernizing test script using functions
2022-11-14Docs: describe how a credential-generating helper worksM Hickford1-3/+5
Previously the docs only described storage helpers. A concrete example: Git Credential Manager can generate credentials for GitHub and GitLab via OAuth. https://github.com/GitCredentialManager/git-credential-manager Signed-off-by: M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14Documentation: fix typoVlad-Stefan Harbuz1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Vlad-Stefan Harbuz <vlad@vladh.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14http: redact curl h2h3 headers in infoGlen Choo2-9/+44
With GIT_TRACE_CURL=1 or GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1, sensitive headers like "Authorization" and "Cookie" get redacted. However, since [1], curl's h2h3 module (invoked when using HTTP/2) also prints headers in its "info", which don't get redacted. For example, echo 'github.com TRUE / FALSE 1698960413304 o foo=bar' >cookiefile && GIT_TRACE_CURL=1 GIT_TRACE_CURL_NO_DATA=1 git \ -c 'http.cookiefile=cookiefile' \ -c 'http.version=' \ ls-remote https://github.com/git/git refs/heads/main 2>output && grep 'cookie' output produces output like: 23:04:16.920495 http.c:678 == Info: h2h3 [cookie: o=foo=bar] 23:04:16.920562 http.c:637 => Send header: cookie: o=<redacted> Teach http.c to check for h2h3 headers in info and redact them using the existing header redaction logic. This fixes the broken redaction logic that we noted in the previous commit, so mark the redaction tests as passing under HTTP2. [1] https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/f8c3724aa90472c0e617ddbbc420aa199971eb77 Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14t: run t5551 tests with both HTTP and HTTP/2Jeff King4-8/+39
We have occasionally seen bugs that affect Git running only against an HTTP/2 web server, not an HTTP one. For instance, b66c77a64e (http: match headers case-insensitively when redacting, 2021-09-22). But since we have no test coverage using HTTP/2, we only uncover these bugs in the wild. That commit gives a recipe for converting our Apache setup to support HTTP/2, but: - it's not necessarily portable - we don't want to just test HTTP/2; we really want to do a variety of basic tests for _both_ protocols This patch handles both problems by running a duplicate of t5551 (labeled as t5559 here) with an alternate-universe setup that enables HTTP/2. So we'll continue to run t5551 as before, but run the same battery of tests again with HTTP/2. If HTTP/2 isn't supported on a given platform, then t5559 should bail during the webserver setup, and gracefully skip all tests (unless GIT_TEST_HTTPD has been changed from "auto" to "yes", where the point is to complain when webserver setup fails). In theory other http-related test scripts could benefit from the same duplication, but doing t5551 should give us a reasonable check of basic functionality, and would have caught both bugs we've seen in the wild with HTTP/2. A few notes on the implementation: - a script enables the server side config by calling enable_http2 before starting the webserver. This avoids even trying to load any HTTP/2 config for t5551 (which is what lets it keep working with regular HTTP even on systems that don't support it). This also sets a prereq which can be used by individual tests. - As discussed in b66c77a64e, the http2 module isn't compatible with the "prefork" mpm, so we need to pick something else. I chose "event" here, which works on my Debian system, but it's possible there are platforms which would prefer something else. We can adjust that later if somebody finds such a platform. - The test "large fetch-pack requests can be sent using chunked encoding" makes sure we use a chunked transfer-encoding by looking for that header in the trace. But since HTTP/2 has its own streaming mechanisms, we won't find such a header. We could skip the test entirely by marking it with !HTTP2. But there's some value in making sure that the fetch itself succeeded. So instead, we'll confirm that either we're using HTTP2 _or_ we saw the expected chunked header. - the redaction tests fail under HTTP/2 with recent versions of curl. This is a bug! I've marked them with !HTTP2 here to skip them under t5559 for the moment. Using test_expect_failure would be more appropriate, but would require a bunch of boilerplate. Since we'll be fixing them momentarily, let's just skip them for now to keep the test suite bisectable, and we can re-enable them in the commit that fixes the bug. - one alternative layout would be to push most of t5551 into a lib-t5551.sh script, then source it from both t5551 and t5559. Keeping t5551 intact seemed a little simpler, as its one less level of indirection for people fixing bugs/regressions in the non-HTTP/2 tests. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14pack-bitmap.c: avoid exposing absolute pathsTeng Long2-6/+9
In "open_midx_bitmap_1()" and "open_pack_bitmap_1()", when we find that there are multiple bitmaps, we will only open the first one and then leave warnings about the remaining pack information, the information will contain the absolute path of the repository, for example in a alternates usage scenario. So let's hide this kind of potentially sensitive information in this commit. Found-by: XingXin <moweng.xx@antgroup.com> Signed-off-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14pack-bitmap.c: remove unnecessary "open_pack_index()" callsTeng Long1-3/+0
When trying to open a pack bitmap, we call open_pack_bitmap_1() in a loop, during which it tries to open up the pack index corresponding with each available pack. It's likely that we'll end up relying on objects in that pack later in the process (in which case we're doing the work of opening the pack index optimistically), but not guaranteed. For instance, consider a repository with a large number of small packs, and one large pack with a bitmap. If we see that bitmap pack last in our loop which calls open_pack_bitmap_1(), the current code will have opened *all* pack index files in the repository. If the request can be served out of the bitmapped pack alone, then the time spent opening these idx files was wasted.S Since open_pack_bitmap_1() calls is_pack_valid() later on (which in turns calls open_pack_index() itself), we can just drop the earlier call altogether. Signed-off-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-14Doc: document push.recurseSubmodules=onlyJonathan Tan5-15/+73
Git learned pushing submodules without pushing the superproject by the user specifying --recurse-submodules=only through 6c656c3fe4 ("submodules: add RECURSE_SUBMODULES_ONLY value", 2016-12-20) and 225e8bf778 ("push: add option to push only submodules", 2016-12-20). For users who use this feature regularly, it is desirable to have an equivalent configuration. It turns out that such a configuration (push.recurseSubmodules=only) is already supported, even though it is neither documented nor mentioned in the commit messages, due to the way the --recurse-submodules=only feature was implemented (a function used to parse --recurse-submodules was updated to support "only", but that same function is used to parse push.recurseSubmodules too). What is left is to document it and test it, which is what this commit does. There is a possible point of confusion when recursing into a submodule that itself has the push.recurseSubmodules=only configuration, because if a repository has only its submodules pushed and not itself, its superproject can never be pushed. Therefore, treat such configurations as being "on-demand", and print a warning message. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-12docs: clarify that credential discards unrecognised attributesM Hickford2-0/+3
It was previously unclear how unrecognised attributes are handled. Signed-off-by: M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-12merge-tree.c: allow specifying the merge-base when --stdin is passedKyle Zhao3-3/+67
The previous commit added a `--merge-base` option in order to allow using a specified merge-base for the merge. Extend the input accepted by `--stdin` to also allow a specified merge-base with each merge requested. For example: printf "<b3> -- <b1> <b2>" | git merge-tree --stdin does a merge of b1 and b2, and uses b3 as the merge-base. Signed-off-by: Kyle Zhao <kylezhao@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-12merge-tree.c: add --merge-base=<commit> optionKyle Zhao3-11/+66
This patch will give our callers more flexibility to use `git merge-tree`, such as: git merge-tree --write-tree --merge-base=branch^ HEAD branch This does a merge of HEAD and branch, but uses branch^ as the merge-base. And the reason why using an option flag instead of a positional argument is to allow additional commits passed to merge-tree to be handled via an octopus merge in the future. Signed-off-by: Kyle Zhao <kylezhao@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11tests(scalar): tighten the stale `scalar.repo` test someJohannes Schindelin1-1/+4
As pointed out by Stolee, the previous incarnation of this test case was not stringent enough: we want to verify that _only_ the stale entries are removed (previously, the test case would have succeeded even if all entries had been removed). Let's rectify this and verify that the other entries are left intact. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11repository-version.txt: partialClone casing changeKousik Sanagavarapu1-2/+2
Remotes are considered "promisor" if extensions.partialClone and some other configuration variables are set. The casing for this in Documentation/technical/repository-version.txt is not proper and may cause confusion. This change corrects this casing. Signed-off-by: Kousik Sanagavarapu <five231003@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11Makefile: don't create a ".build/.build/" for cocci, fix outputÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason2-8/+8
Fix a couple of issues in the recently merged 0f3c55d4c2b (Merge branch 'ab/coccicheck-incremental' into next, 2022-11-08): In copying over the "contrib/coccinelle/" rules to ".build/contrib/coccinelle/" we inadvertently ended up with a ".build/.build/contrib/coccinelle/" as well. We'd generate the per-file patches in the former, and keep the rule and overall result in the latter. E.g. running: make contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch COCCI_SOURCES="attr.c grep.c" Would, per "tree -a .build" yield the following result: .build ├── .build │   └── contrib │   └── coccinelle │   └── free.cocci.patch │   ├── attr.c │   ├── attr.c.log │   ├── grep.c │   └── grep.c.log └── contrib └── coccinelle ├── FOUND_H_SOURCES ├── free.cocci └── free.cocci.patch Now we'll instead generate all of our files in ".build/contrib/coccinelle/". Fixing this required renaming the directory where we keep our per-file patches, as we'd otherwise conflict with the result. Now the per-file patch directory is named e.g. "free.cocci.d". And the end result will now be: .build └── contrib └── coccinelle ├── FOUND_H_SOURCES ├── free.cocci ├── free.cocci.d │   ├── attr.c.patch │   ├── attr.c.patch.log │   ├── grep.c.patch │   └── grep.c.patch.log └── free.cocci.patch The per-file patches now have a ".patch" file suffix, which fixes another issue reported against 0f3c55d4c2b: The summary output was confusing. Before for the "make" command above we'd emit: [...] MKDIR -p .build/contrib/coccinelle CP contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci .build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci GEN .build/contrib/coccinelle/FOUND_H_SOURCES MKDIR -p .build/.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch SPATCH .build/.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch/grep.c SPATCH .build/.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch/attr.c SPATCH CAT $^ >.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch CP .build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch But now we'll instead emit (identical output at the start omitted): [...] MKDIR -p .build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.d SPATCH grep.c >.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.d/grep.c.patch SPATCH attr.c >.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.d/attr.c.patch SPATCH CAT .build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.d/**.patch >.build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch CP .build/contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci.patch I.e. we have an "SPATCH" line that makes it clear that we're running against the "{attr,grep}.c" file. The "SPATCH CAT" is then altered to correspond to it, showing that we're concatenating the "free.cocci.d/**.patch" files into one generated "free.cocci.patch" at the end. Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11Turn `git bisect` into a full built-inJohannes Schindelin4-5/+4
Now that the shell script hands off to the `bisect--helper` to do _anything_ (except to show the help), it is but a tiny step to let the helper implement the actual `git bisect` command instead. This retires `git-bisect.sh`, concluding a multi-year journey that many hands helped with, in particular Pranit Bauna, Tanushree Tumane and Miriam Rubio. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect--helper: log: allow arbitrary number of argumentsĐoàn Trần Công Danh2-5/+1
In a later change, we would like to turn bisect into a builtin by renaming bisect--helper. However, there's an oddity that "git bisect log" accepts any number of arguments and it will just ignore them all. Let's prepare for the next step by ignoring any arguments passed to "git bisect--helper log" Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect--helper: handle states directlyJohannes Schindelin2-21/+19
In preparation for making `git bisect` a real built-in, let's prepare the `bisect--helper` built-in to handle `git bisect--helper good` and `git bisect--helper bad`, i.e. eliminate the need of `state` subcommand. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect--helper: emit usage for "git bisect"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-15/+36
In subsequent commits we'll be removing "git-bisect.sh" in favor of promoting "bisect--helper" to a "bisect" built-in. In doing that we'll first need to have it support "git bisect--helper <cmd>" rather than "git bisect--helper --<cmd>", and then finally have its "-h" output claim to be "bisect" rather than "bisect--helper". Instead of suffering that churn let's start claiming to be "git bisect" now. In just a few commits this will be true, and in the meantime emitting the "wrong" usage information from the helper is a small price to pay to avoid the churn. Let's also declare "BUILTIN_*" macros, when we eventually migrate the sub-commands themselves to parse_options() we'll be able to re-use the strings. See 0afd556b2e1 (worktree: define subcommand -h in terms of command -h, 2022-10-13) for a recent example. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect test: test exit codes on bad usageÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+30
Address a test blindspot, the "log" command is the odd one out because "git-bisect.sh" ignores any arguments it receives. Let's test both the exit codes we expect, and the stderr and stdout we're emitting. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect--helper: identify as bisect when report errorĐoàn Trần Công Danh1-5/+8
In a later change, we will convert the bisect--helper to be builtin bisect. Let's start by self-identifying it's the real bisect when reporting error. This change is safe since 'git bisect--helper' is an implementation detail, users aren't expected to call 'git bisect--helper'. Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect-run: verify_good: account for non-negative exit statusĐoàn Trần Công Danh2-2/+2
Some system never reports negative exit code at all, they reports them as bigger-than-128 instead. We take extra care for those systems in the later check for normal 'do_bisect_run' loop. Let's check it here, too. Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect run: keep some of the post-v2.30.0 outputĐoàn Trần Công Danh2-21/+58
Preceding commits fixed output and behavior regressions in d1bbbe45df8 (bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_run` shell function in C, 2021-09-13), which did not claim to be changing the output of "git bisect run". But some of the output it emitted was subjectively better, so once we've asserted that we're back on v2.29.0 behavior, let's change some of it back: - We now quote the arguments again, but omit the first " " when printing the "running" line. - Ditto for other cases where we emitted the argument - We say "found first bad commit" again, not just "run success" Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Based-on-patch-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect: fix output regressions in v2.30.0Đoàn Trần Công Danh2-16/+19
When d1bbbe45df8 (bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_run` shell function in C, 2021-09-13) reimplemented parts of "git bisect run" in C it changed the output we emitted so that: - The "running ..." line was now quoted - We lost the \n after our output - We started saying "bisect found ..." instead of "bisect run success" Arguably some of this is better now, but as d1bbbe45df8 did not advocate for changing the output, let's revert this for now. It'll be easy to change it back if that's what we'd prefer. This does not change the one remaining use of "command.buf" to emit the quoted argument, as that's new in d1bbbe45df8. Some of these cases were not tested for in the tests added in the preceding commit, I didn't have time to fleshen those out, but a look at f1de981e8b6 will show that the other output being adjusted here is now equivalent to what it was before d1bbbe45df8. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect: refactor bisect_run() to match CodingGuidelinesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-4/+3
We didn't add "{}" to all "if/else" branches, and one "error" was mis-indented. Let's fix that first, which makes subsequent commits smaller. In the case of the "if" we can simply early return instead. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11bisect tests: test for v2.30.0 "bisect run" regressionsÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+79
Add three failing tests which succeed on v2.29.0, but due to the topic merged at [1] (specifically [2]) have been failing since then. We'll address those regressions in subsequent commits. There was also a "regression" where: git bisect run ./missing-script.sh Would count a non-existing script as "good", as the shell would exit with 127. That edge case is a bit too insane to preserve, so let's not add it to these regression tests. There was another regression that 'git bisect' consumed some options that was meant to passed down to program run with 'git bisect run'. Since that regression is breaking user's expectation, it has been fixed earlier without this patch queued. 1. 0a4cb1f1f2f (Merge branch 'mr/bisect-in-c-4', 2021-09-23) 2. d1bbbe45df8 (bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_run` shell function in C, 2021-09-13) Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-11Merge branch 'dd/bisect-helper-subcommand' into dd/git-bisect-builtinTaylor Blau3-120/+142
* dd/bisect-helper-subcommand: bisect--helper: parse subcommand with OPT_SUBCOMMAND bisect--helper: move all subcommands into their own functions bisect--helper: remove unused options
2022-11-11bisect--helper: parse subcommand with OPT_SUBCOMMANDĐoàn Trần Công Danh3-90/+30
As of it is, we're parsing subcommand with OPT_CMDMODE, which will continue to parse more options even if the command has been found. When we're running "git bisect run" with a command that expecting a "--log" or "--no-log" arguments, or one of those "--bisect-..." arguments, bisect--helper may mistakenly think those options are bisect--helper's option. We may fix those problems by passing "--" when calling from git-bisect.sh, and skip that "--" in bisect--helper. However, it may interfere with user's "--". Let's parse subcommand with OPT_SUBCOMMAND since that API was born for this specific use-case. Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>