summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-02-27unpack-trees: rewrap a few overlong lines from previous patchElijah Newren1-7/+9
The previous patch made many lines a little longer, resulting in four becoming a bit too long. They were left as-is for the previous patch to facilitate reviewers verifying that we were just adding "internal." in a bunch of places, but rewrap them now. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27unpack-trees: mark fields only used internally as internalElijah Newren2-90/+95
Continue the work from the previous patch by finding additional fields which are only used internally but not yet explicitly marked as such, and include them in the internal fields struct. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27unpack_trees: start splitting internal fields from public APIElijah Newren2-22/+25
This just splits the two fields already marked as internal-only into a separate internal struct. Future commits will add more fields that were meant to be internal-only but were not explicitly marked as such to the same struct. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27sparse-checkout: avoid using internal API of unpack-trees, take 2Elijah Newren2-1/+1
Commit 2f6b1eb794 ("cache API: add a "INDEX_STATE_INIT" macro/function, add release_index()", 2023-01-12) mistakenly added some initialization of a member of unpack_trees_options that was intended to be internal-only. This initialization should be done within update_sparsity() instead. Note that while o->result is mostly meant for unpack_trees() and update_sparsity() mostly operates without o->result, check_ok_to_remove() does consult it so we need to ensure it is properly initialized. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27sparse-checkout: avoid using internal API of unpack-treesElijah Newren3-10/+14
struct unpack_trees_options has the following field and comment: struct pattern_list *pl; /* for internal use */ Despite the internal-use comment, commit e091228e17 ("sparse-checkout: update working directory in-process", 2019-11-21) starting setting this field from an external caller. At the time, the only way around that would have been to modify unpack_trees() to take an extra pattern_list argument, and there's a lot of callers of that function. However, when we split update_sparsity() off as a separate function, with sparse-checkout being the sole caller, the need to update other callers went away. Fix this API problem by adding a pattern_list argument to update_sparsity() and stop setting the internal o.pl field directly. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27unpack-trees: clean up some flow controlElijah Newren1-4/+3
The update_sparsity() function was introduced in commit 7af7a25853 ("unpack-trees: add a new update_sparsity() function", 2020-03-27). Prior to that, unpack_trees() was used, but that had a few bugs because the needs of the caller were different, and different enough that unpack_trees() could not easily be modified to handle both usecases. The implementation detail that update_sparsity() was written by copying unpack_trees() and then streamlining it, and then modifying it in the needed ways still shows through in that there are leftover vestiges in both functions that are no longer needed. Clean them up. In particular: * update_sparsity() allows a pattern list to be passed in, but unpack_trees() never should use a different pattern list. Add a check and a BUG() if this gets violated. * update_sparsity() has a check early on that will BUG() if o->skip_sparse_checkout is set; as such, there's no need to check for that condition again later in the code. We can simply remove the check and its corresponding goto label. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27dir: mark output only fields of dir_struct as suchElijah Newren1-8/+8
While at it, also group these fields together for convenience. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27dir: add a usage note to exclude_per_dirElijah Newren1-2/+6
As evidenced by the fix a couple commits ago, places in the code using exclude_per_dir are likely buggy and should be adapted to call setup_standard_excludes() instead. Unfortunately, the usage of exclude_per_dir has been hardcoded into the arguments ls-files accepts, so we cannot actually remove it. Add a note that it is deprecated and no other callers should use it directly. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27dir: separate public from internal portion of dir_structElijah Newren2-94/+102
In order to make it clearer to callers what portions of dir_struct are public API, and avoid errors from them setting fields that are meant as internal API, split the fields used for internal implementation reasons into a separate embedded struct. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27unpack-trees: heed requests to overwrite ignored filesElijah Newren2-1/+12
When a directory exists but has only ignored files within it and we are trying to switch to a branch that has a file where that directory is, the behavior depends upon --[no]-overwrite-ignore. If the user wants to --overwrite-ignore (the default), then we should delete the ignored file and directory and switch to the new branch. The code to handle this in verify_clean_subdirectory() in unpack-trees tried to handle this via paying attention to the exclude_per_dir setting of the internal dir field. This came from commit c81935348b ("Fix switching to a branch with D/F when current branch has file D.", 2007-03-15), which pre-dated 039bc64e88 ("core.excludesfile clean-up", 2007-11-14), and thus did not pay attention to ignore patterns from other relevant files. Change it to use setup_standard_excludes() so that it is also aware of excludes specified in other locations. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27t2021: fix platform-specific leftover cruftElijah Newren1-1/+4
t2021.6 existed to test the status of a symlink that was left around by previous tests. It tried to also clean up the symlink after it was done so that subsequent tests wouldn't be tripped up by it. Unfortunately, since this test had a SYMLINK prerequisite, that made the cleanup platform dependent...and made a testcase I was trying to add to this testsuite fail (that testcase will be included in the next patch). Before we go and add new testcases, fix this cleanup by moving it into a separate test. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27drop pure pass-through config callbacksJeff King4-24/+4
Commit fd2d4c135e (gpg-interface: lazily initialize and read the configuration, 2023-02-09) shrunk a few custom config callbacks so that they are just one-liners of: return git_default_config(...); We can drop them entirely and replace them direct calls of git_default_config() intead. This makes the code a little shorter and easier to understand (with the downside being that if they do grow custom options again later, we'll have to recreate the functions). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-27fsck: check even zero-entry index filesJeff King1-3/+2
In fb64ca526a (fsck: check index files in all worktrees, 2023-02-24), we swapped out a call to vanilla repo_read_index() for a series of read_index_from() calls, one per worktree. The code for the latter was copied from add_index_objects_to_pending(), which checks for a positive return value from the index reading function, and we do the same here in fsck now. But this is probably the wrong thing. I had interpreted the check as "don't operate on the index struct if there was an error". But in reality, if there is an error then the index-reading code will simply die (which admittedly is not great for fsck, but that is not a new problem). The return value here is actually the number of entries read. So it makes sense for add_index_objects_to_pending() to ignore a zero-entry index (there is nothing to add). But for fsck, we would still want to check any extensions, etc (though presumably it is unlikely to have them in an empty index, I don't think it's impossible). So we should ignore the return value from read_index_from() entirely. This matches the behavior before fb64ca526a, when we ignored the return value from repo_read_index(). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-25switch: reject if the branch is already checked out elsewhere (test)Rubén Justo1-0/+29
Since 5883034 (checkout: reject if the branch is already checked out elsewhere) in normal use, we do not allow multiple worktrees having the same checked out branch. A bug has recently been fixed that caused this to not work as expected. Let's add a test to notice if this changes in the future. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-25rebase: refuse to switch to a branch already checked out elsewhere (test)Rubén Justo1-0/+14
In b5cabb4a9 (rebase: refuse to switch to branch already checked out elsewhere, 2020-02-23) we add a condition to prevent a rebase operation involving a switch to a branch that is already checked out in another worktree. A bug has recently been fixed that caused this to not work as expected. Let's add a test to notice if this changes in the future. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-25branch: fix die_if_checked_out() when ignore_current_worktreeRubén Justo2-7/+10
In 8d9fdd7 (worktree.c: check whether branch is rebased in another worktree, 2016-04-22) die_if_checked_out() learned a new option ignore_current_worktree, to modify the operation from "die() if the branch is checked out in any worktree" to "die() if the branch is checked out in any worktree other than the current one". Unfortunately we implemented it by checking the flag is_current in the worktree that find_shared_symref() returns. When the same branch is checked out in several worktrees simultaneously, find_shared_symref() will return the first matching worktree in the list composed by get_worktrees(). If one of the worktrees with the checked out branch is the current worktree, find_shared_symref() may or may not return it, depending on the order in the list. Instead of find_shared_symref(), let's do the search using use the recently introduced API is_shared_symref(), and consider ignore_current_worktree when necessary. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-25worktree: introduce is_shared_symref()Rubén Justo2-31/+37
Add a new function, is_shared_symref(), which contains the heart of find_shared_symref(). Refactor find_shared_symref() to use the new function is_shared_symref(). Soon, we will use is_shared_symref() to search for symref beyond the first worktree that matches. Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-25t9700: modernize test scriptsZhang Yi1-28/+27
The style of t9700-perl-git.sh is old. There are 3 problems: * A title is not on the same line with test_expect_success command. * A test body is indented by whitespaces. * There are whitespaces after redirect operators. Modernize test scripts by: * Combine the title with test_expect_success command. * Replace whitespace indents with TAB. * Delete whitespaces after redirect operators. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <18994118902@163.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24A few more topics post 2.40-rc0Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24Merge branch 'ps/free-island-marks'Junio C Hamano2-5/+23
Fix on a previous fix already in 'master'. * ps/free-island-marks: delta-islands: fix segfault when freeing island marks
2023-02-24Merge branch 'jk/http-proxy-tests'Junio C Hamano4-0/+65
Test updates. * jk/http-proxy-tests: add basic http proxy tests
2023-02-24Merge branch 'ma/fetch-parallel-use-online-cpus'Junio C Hamano2-0/+8
"git fetch --jobs=0" used to hit a BUG(), which has been corrected to use the available CPUs. * ma/fetch-parallel-use-online-cpus: fetch: choose a sensible default with --jobs=0 again
2023-02-24Git 2.40-rc0v2.40.0-rc0Junio C Hamano2-1/+15
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24Merge branch 'jc/genzeros-avoid-raw-write'Junio C Hamano1-5/+6
A test helper had a single write(2) of 256kB, which was too big for some platforms (e.g. NonStop), which has been corrected by using xwrite() wrapper appropriately. * jc/genzeros-avoid-raw-write: test-genzeros: avoid raw write(2)
2023-02-24Merge branch 'rd/doc-default-date-format'Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
Update --date=default documentation. * rd/doc-default-date-format: rev-list: clarify git-log default date format
2023-02-24Merge branch 'js/gpg-errors'Junio C Hamano2-2/+50
Error messages given upon a signature verification failure used to discard the errors from underlying gpg program, which has been corrected. * js/gpg-errors: gpg: do show gpg's error message upon failure t7510: add a test case that does not need gpg
2023-02-24Merge branch 'rs/ctype-test'Junio C Hamano1-2/+28
Test safe_ctype * rs/ctype-test: test-ctype: test iscntrl, ispunct, isxdigit and isprint test-ctype: test islower and isupper test-ctype: test isascii
2023-02-24fsck: mention file path for index errorsJeff King2-16/+46
If we encounter an error in an index file, we may say something like: error: 1234abcd: invalid sha1 pointer in resolve-undo But if you have multiple worktrees, each with its own index, it can be very helpful to know which file had the problem. So let's pass that path down through the various index-fsck functions and use it where appropriate. After this patch you should get something like: error: 1234abcd: invalid sha1 pointer in resolve-undo of .git/worktrees/wt/index That's a bit verbose, but since the point is that you shouldn't see this normally, we're better to err on the side of more details. I've also added the index filename to the name used by "fsck --name-objects", which will show up if we find the object to be missing, etc. This is bending the rules a little there, as the option claims to write names that can be fed to rev-parse. But there is no revision syntax to access the index of another worktree, so the best we can do is make up something that a human will probably understand. I did take care to retain the existing ":file" syntax for the current worktree. So the uglier output should kick in only when it's actually necessary. See the included tests for examples of both forms. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24fsck: check index files in all worktreesJeff King2-2/+28
We check the index file for the main worktree, but completely ignore the index files in other worktrees. These should be checked, too, as they are part of the repository state (and in particular, errors in those index files may cause repo-wide operations like "git gc" to complain). Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24fsck: factor out index fsckJeff King1-24/+30
The code to fsck an index operates directly on the_index. Let's move it into its own function in preparation for handling the index files from other worktrees. Since we now have only a single reference to the_index, let's drop our USE_THE_INDEX_VARIABLE definition and just use the_repository.index directly. That's a minor cleanup, but also ensures that we didn't miss any references when moving the code into fsck_index(). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24help: mark unused parameter in git_unknown_cmd_config()Jeff King1-1/+2
The extra callback parameter became unused in 0918d08887 (help.c: fix autocorrect in work tree for bare repository, 2022-10-29), but we can't get rid of it because we must conform to the config callback interface. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24run_processes_parallel: mark unused callback parametersJeff King5-19/+21
Our parallel process API takes several callbacks via function pointers in the run_process_paralell_opts struct. Not every callback needs every parameter; let's mark the unused ones to make -Wunused-parameter happy. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24userformat_want_item(): mark unused parameterJeff King1-1/+2
This function is used as a callback to strbuf_expand(), so it must conform to the correct interface. But naturally it doesn't need to touch its "sb" parameter, since it is only examining the placeholder string, and not actually writing any output. So mark the unused parameter to silence -Wunused-parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24for_each_commit_graft(): mark unused callback parameterJeff King1-1/+2
The for_each_commit_graft() functions takes a callback, but not every callback uses the void data parameter. Mark the unused one to appease the -Wunused-parameter warning. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24rewrite_parents(): mark unused callback parameterJeff King1-1/+2
The rewrite_parents() function takes a callback, but not every callback needs the "rev" parameter. Mark the unused one so -Wunused-parameter will be happy. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24fetch-pack: mark unused parameter in callback functionJeff King1-1/+1
The for_each_cached_alternate() interface requires a callback that takes a negotiator parameter, but not all implementations need it. Mark the unused one as such to appease -Wunused-parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24notes: mark unused callback parametersJeff King2-7/+9
for_each_note() requires a callback, but not all callbacks need all of the parameters. Likewise, init_notes() takes a callback to implement the "combine" strategy, but the "ignore" variant obviously doesn't look at its arguments at all. Mark unused parameters as appropriate to silence compiler warnings. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24prio-queue: mark unused parameters in comparison functionsJeff King3-4/+6
The prio_queue_compare_fn interface has a void pointer to allow callers to pass arbitrary data, but most comparison functions don't need it. Mark those cases to make -Wunused-parameter happy. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24for_each_object: mark unused callback parametersJeff King14-45/+56
The for_each_{loose,packed}_object interface uses callback functions, but not every callback needs all of the parameters. Mark the unused ones to satisfy -Wunused-parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24list-objects: mark unused callback parametersJeff King4-17/+22
Our graph-traversal functions take callbacks for showing commits and objects, but not all callbacks need each parameter. Likewise for the similar traverse_bitmap_commit_list(), which has a different interface but serves the same purpose. And the include_check mechanism, which passes along a void pointer which is not always used. Mark the unused ones to to make -Wunused-parameter happy. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24mark unused parameters in signal handlersJeff King4-4/+4
Signal handlers receive their signal number as a parameter, but many don't care what it is (because they only handle one signal, or because their action is the same regardless of the signal). Mark such parameters to silence -Wunused-parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24run-command: mark error routine parameters as unusedJeff King1-3/+3
After forking but before exec-ing a command, we install special error/warn/die handlers in the child. These ignore the error messages they get, since the idea is that they shouldn't be called in the first place. Arguably they could pass along that error message _in addition_ to saying "error() should not be called in a child", but since the whole point is to avoid any conflicts on stdio/malloc locks, etc, we're better to just keep these simple. Seeing them trigger is effectively a bug, and the developer is probably better off grabbing a stack trace. But we do want to mark the functions so that -Wunused-parameter doesn't complain. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24mark "pointless" data pointers in callbacksJeff King2-2/+3
Both the object_array_filter() and trie_find() functions use callback functions that let the caller specify which elements match. These callbacks take a void pointer in case the caller wants to pass in extra data. But in each case, the single user of these functions just passes NULL, and the callback ignores the extra pointer. We could just remove these unused parameters from the callback interface entirely. But it's good practice to provide such a pointer, as it guides future callers of the function in the right direction (rather than tempting them to access global data). Plus it's consistent with other generic callback interfaces. So let's instead annotate the unused parameters, in order to silence the compiler's -Wunused-parameter warning. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24ref-filter: mark unused callback parametersJeff King1-22/+40
The ref-filter code uses virtual functions to handle specific atoms, but many of the functions ignore some parameters: - most atom parsers do not need the ref_format itself, unless they are looking at centralized options like use_color, quote_style, etc. - meta-atom handlers like append_atom(), align_atom_handler(), etc, can't generate errors, so ignore their "err" parameter - likewise, the handlers for then/else/end do not even need to look at their atom_value, as the "if" handler put everything they need into the ref_formatting_state stack Since these functions all have to conform to virtual function interfaces, we can't just drop the unused parameters, but must mark them as UNUSED (to appease -Wunused-parameter). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24http-backend: mark unused parameters in virtual functionsJeff King1-3/+3
The http-backend dispatches requests via a table of virtual functions. Some of the functions ignore their "arg" parameter, because it's implicit in the function (e.g., get_info_refs knows that it is dispatched only for a request to "/info/refs"). Mark these unused parameters to silence -Wunused-parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24http-backend: mark argc/argv unusedJeff King1-1/+1
We can't drop them because it's cmd_main(), which has a set prototype, but the CGI interface does not do anything with such arguments. Arguably we could detect them and complain. It's possible this could detect misconfigurations or other mistakes, but: - as far as I can tell common webservers like apache do not have any mechanism to pass arguments to a CGI at all, so this isn't a mistake one could even make - it's possible that some obscure webserver might pass arguments, and we'd break that case. I have no idea if such a webserver exists; the CGI standard says only "The script is invoked in a system-defined manner". So probably it would not hurt to detect them, but it also is unlikely to help anyone. Let's just mark them as unused, which retains the current behavior but silences -Wunused-parameter. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24object-name: mark unused parameters in disambiguate callbacksJeff King1-7/+7
The object-name disambiguation code triggers a callback for each possible object id we find. This is really used for two purposes: - "hint" functions like disambiguate_commit_only report back on whether the value is usable - iterator functions like repo_for_each_abbrev() use it to collect and report matching names. Compiling with -Wunused-parameter generates several warnings, but they're distinct for each type. The "hint" functions never look at the void cb_data pointer; they only care whether the oid matches our hint. The iterator functions never look at the "struct repository" parameter; they're just reporting back the oids they see, and always return 0. So arguably these could be two separate interfaces: int (*hint)(struct repository *r, const struct object_id *oid); void (*iter)(const struct object_id *oid, void *cb_data); But doing so would complicate the disambiguation code, which now has to accept and call the two different types. Since we can easily squelch the compiler warnings by annotating the functions, let's just do that. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24serve: mark unused parameters in virtual functionsJeff King2-6/+6
Each v2 "serve" action has a virtual function for advertising and implementing the command. A few of these are so trivial that they don't need to look at their parameters, especially the "repository" parameter. We can mark them so that -Wunused-parameter doesn't complain. Note that upload_pack_v2() probably _should_ be using its repository pointer. But teaching the functions it calls to do so is non-trivial. Even using it for something as simple as reading config is tricky, both because it shares code with the v1 upload pack, and because the git_protected_config() mechanism it uses does not have a repo-specific interface. So we'll just annotate it for now, and cleaning it up can be part of the larger work to drop references to the_repository. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24serve: use repository pointer to get configJeff King4-10/+10
A few of the v2 "serve" callbacks ignore their repository parameter and read config using the_repository (either directly or implicitly by calling wrapper functions). This isn't a bug since the server code only handles a single main repository anyway (and indeed, if you look at the callers, these repository parameters will always be the_repository). But in the long run we want to get rid of the_repository, so let's take a tiny step in that direction. As a bonus, this silences some -Wunused-parameter warnings. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-02-24ls-refs: drop config cachingJeff King1-22/+12
The code for the v2 ls-refs command has an ensure_config_read() function that tries to read the lsrefs.unborn config only once and caches it in some static global variables. There's no real need for this caching. In any given process we'd only need the value twice (once to decide whether to advertise, and once if somebody runs the command). And since the config code already has its own cache, each access is only incurring a hash lookup and string comparison anyway. Since the values we set are going to be specific to the_repository, the globals we set are a mild anti-pattern. In practice it's not a bug (yet) since the server-side v2 code only handles a single repository anyway. But it doesn't hurt to take a small step in the right direction and model a good approach. Note that we currently set two booleans: advertise_unborn and allow_unborn. But we can get away with a single value, since "advertise" naturally implies "allow". That lets us just convert this to a function with a return value. Note that we still always read from the_repository; we'll deal with that in a follow-on patch. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>